Bug 1325928 - [abrt] irq 34: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Summary: [abrt] irq 34: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: kernel
Version: 23
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kernel Maintainer List
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf...
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:fd9219816e80dcdb78f09de0f99...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-11 12:37 UTC by Ting-Wei Lan
Modified: 2018-01-22 12:47 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-20 19:54:30 UTC
Type: ---
lantw44: needinfo-


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: dmesg (93.50 KB, text/plain)
2016-04-11 12:37 UTC, Ting-Wei Lan
no flags Details

Description Ting-Wei Lan 2016-04-11 12:37:48 UTC
Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.6.4
irq 34: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.4.6-301.fc23.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. B23E/B23E, BIOS B23E.210 11/27/2012
 0000000000000086 c91219f98f26651d ffff880235803e48 ffffffff813b542e
 ffff8800b98f6c00 ffff8800b98f6c9c ffff880235803e70 ffffffff810ff183
 ffff8800b98f6c00 0000000000000000 0000000000000022 ffff880235803ea8
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>  [<ffffffff813b542e>] dump_stack+0x63/0x85
 [<ffffffff810ff183>] __report_bad_irq+0x33/0xc0
 [<ffffffff810ff50e>] note_interrupt+0x23e/0x280
 [<ffffffff810fc7b4>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x164/0x1d0
 [<ffffffff810fc84c>] handle_irq_event+0x2c/0x50
 [<ffffffff810ffd1f>] handle_edge_irq+0x6f/0x130
 [<ffffffff81019de3>] handle_irq+0x73/0x120
 [<ffffffff810c35ea>] ? atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x20
 [<ffffffff817a2ffb>] do_IRQ+0x4b/0xd0
 [<ffffffff817a1047>] common_interrupt+0x87/0x87
 <EOI>  [<ffffffff8163cefe>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0x10e/0x2b0
 [<ffffffff8163ceef>] ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xff/0x2b0
 [<ffffffff8163d0d7>] cpuidle_enter+0x17/0x20
 [<ffffffff810e65b2>] call_cpuidle+0x32/0x60
 [<ffffffff8163d0b3>] ? cpuidle_select+0x13/0x20
 [<ffffffff810e6870>] cpu_startup_entry+0x290/0x350
 [<ffffffff817947bc>] rest_init+0x7c/0x80
 [<ffffffff81d6201e>] start_kernel+0x498/0x4b9
 [<ffffffff81d61120>] ? early_idt_handler_array+0x120/0x120
 [<ffffffff81d61339>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
 [<ffffffff81d61485>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x14a/0x16d

Potential duplicate: bug 1123669

Comment 1 Ting-Wei Lan 2016-04-11 12:37:58 UTC
Created attachment 1145985 [details]
File: dmesg

Comment 2 Laura Abbott 2016-04-11 15:34:21 UTC
How often has this been seen? It looks like the iwl hardware did not start properly

Comment 3 Ting-Wei Lan 2016-04-11 16:14:13 UTC
This happens once today, but I don't know whether it will happen again. When it happened, the Wi-Fi status became 'unavailable' or 'disabled by hardware' and I had to restart NetworkManager one or more times to get it connected. It became disconnected after using for a few minutes and I had to restart NetworkManager again to get the connection.

Comment 4 Laura Abbott 2016-09-23 19:35:43 UTC
*********** MASS BUG UPDATE **************
 
We apologize for the inconvenience.  There is a large number of bugs to go through and several of them have gone stale.  Due to this, we are doing a mass bug update across all of the Fedora 23 kernel bugs.
 
Fedora 23 has now been rebased to 4.7.4-100.fc23.  Please test this kernel update (or newer) and let us know if you issue has been resolved or if it is still present with the newer kernel.
 
If you have moved on to Fedora 24 or 25, and are still experiencing this issue, please change the version to Fedora 24 or 25.
 
If you experience different issues, please open a new bug report for those.

Comment 5 Ting-Wei Lan 2016-10-05 09:54:43 UTC
This issue is hard to reproduce, so I am able to provide the requested information unless it really happens again.

Comment 6 Ting-Wei Lan 2016-10-05 09:55:31 UTC
This issue is hard to reproduce, so I am not able to provide the requested information unless it really happens again.

Comment 7 Fedora End Of Life 2016-11-25 07:19:37 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '23'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 8 Fedora End Of Life 2016-12-20 19:54:30 UTC
Fedora 23 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-12-20. Fedora 23 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.