Hide Forgot
Created attachment 1146314 [details] Error is raised on UI, but it doesn't point which interface has the issue. Ideally interface tab should be highlighted with red border Description of problem: I was trying to provision a host on rhev instance and I configured couple of virtual interfaces while provisioning the host. Host provisioning failed with error: 2016-04-12 05:39:55 [app] [W] Failed to create a compute rhevm1.satellite.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com (RHEV) instance sghaihost.katello-latest.satellite.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com: NIC name required for add | | OVIRT::OvirtException: NIC name required for add | /opt/theforeman/tfm/root/usr/share/gems/gems/rbovirt-0.0.36/lib/rbovirt.rb:210:in `handle_fault' | /opt/theforeman/tfm/root/usr/share/gems/gems/rbovirt-0.0.36/lib/rbovirt.rb:130:in `rescue in http_post' | /opt/theforeman/tfm/root/usr/share/gems/gems/rbovirt-0.0.36/lib/rbovirt.rb:127:in `http_post' | /opt/theforeman/tfm/root/usr/share/gems/gems/rbovirt-0.0.36/lib/client/vm_api.rb:57:in `add_interface' | /opt/theforeman/tfm/root/usr/share/gems/gems/fog-1.37.0/lib/fog/ovirt/requests/compute/add_interface.rb:8:in `add_interface' I think there are couple of issues: 1) if nic name is required then that field should marked as mandatory with '*' 2) UI should point the 'interfaces' tab with red border and if possible, also point specific interface where nic name was missing. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): sat6.2 beta snap7.1 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. create a host on rhev instance 2. 3. Actual results: | OVIRT::OvirtException: NIC name required for add | /opt/theforeman/tfm/root/usr/share/gems/gems/rbovirt-0.0.36/lib/rbovirt.rb:210:in `handle_fault' Expected results: 1) if nic name is required then that field should marked as mandatory with '*' 2) UI should point the 'interfaces' tab with red border and if possible, also point specific interface where nic name was missing. Additional info:
Created attachment 1146315 [details] Name field is not set as mandatory with *
Moving 6.2 bugs out to sat-backlog.
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the forseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.