From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040808 Firefox/0.9.3 Description of problem: I just got an x86_64 box and installed fc2. No problems. however, doing yum update returns this error: ....unable to satisfy dependencies package samba needs samba-common = 0:3.0.3, this is not available. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): samba-3.0.3 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install fc2 on x86_64 2. yum update 3. Actual Results: the above error msg Expected Results: all rpms updated Additional info:
You probably have both the i386 and the x86_64 versions of samba installed, but the yum repository you are pointing at only contains the x86_64 rpms. Run the command rpm -a -q --queryformat "%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-%{arch}\n" | egrep samba to see the Samba rpms you have installed. Try modifying your yum.conf file to include both the x86_64 and i386 repositories. If that doesn't fix the problem, I'll have to reassign this to the yum maintainer.
I have an FC2 x86_64 box that I've been running for several months with no problems (SK8V, opteron 142, single disc SATA, 1GB ram, Radeon 9800 pro). It was created using the "install everything option" and has all available updates installed except for the most recent version of samba. Both up2date and yum give the same error. here is output from yum: [root]# yum update samba Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: Fedora Core 2 - x86_64 - Base Server: Fedora Core 2 - x86_64 - Released Updates Finding updated packages Downloading needed headers Resolving dependencies ......Unable to satisfy dependencies Package samba needs samba-common = 0:3.0.3, this is not available. [root]# rpm says I have the following samba packages (these were installed using up2date): samba-3.0.3-5 samba-client-3.0.3-5 samba-common-3.0.3-5 samba-swat-3.0.3-5 A couple of BBS's report getting around this problem by either removing and reinstalling samba or by using the '--force' option. Thus far, I have not tried either of these.
Here is my initial rpm package query output: # rpm -a -q --queryformat "%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-%{arch}\n" | egrep samba system-config-samba-1.2.9-2-noarch samba-client-3.0.3-5-x86_64 samba-swat-3.0.3-5-x86_64 samba-common-3.0.3-5-x86_64 samba-3.0.3-5-i386 samba-3.0.3-5-x86_64 I then added two new sections to my yum.conf file to include the i386 architecture for base and released updates. It worked! Here is the end of yum's output (after downloading a long list of package headers): ... Resolving dependencies ..Dependencies resolved I will do the following: [update: samba 3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64] [update: samba 3.0.7-2.FC2.i386] I will install/upgrade these to satisfy the dependencies: [deps: samba-client 3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64] [deps: samba-swat 3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64] [deps: samba-common 3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64] Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages Getting samba-client-3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64.rpm samba-client-3.0.7-2.FC2. 100% |=========================| 3.7 MB 00:12 Getting samba-3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64.rpm samba-3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64. 100% |=========================| 14 MB 00:52 Getting samba-swat-3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64.rpm samba-swat-3.0.7-2.FC2.x8 100% |=========================| 6.6 MB 00:19 Getting samba-3.0.7-2.FC2.i386.rpm samba-3.0.7-2.FC2.i386.rp 100% |=========================| 13 MB 00:38 Getting samba-common-3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64.rpm samba-common-3.0.7-2.FC2. 100% |=========================| 4.6 MB 00:13 Running test transaction: Test transaction complete, Success! warning: /etc/samba/smb.conf created as /etc/samba/smb.conf.rpmnew samba-common 100 % done 1/10 samba 100 % done 2/10 samba-client 100 % done 3/10 warning: /etc/logrotate.d/samba created as /etc/logrotate.d/samba.rpmnew warning: /etc/pam.d/samba created as /etc/pam.d/samba.rpmnew warning: /etc/samba/smbusers created as /etc/samba/smbusers.rpmnew warning: /etc/sysconfig/samba created as /etc/sysconfig/samba.rpmnew samba 100 % done 4/10 samba-swat 100 % done 5/10 Completing update for samba-client - 6/10 Completing update for samba - 7/10 Completing update for samba-swat - 8/10 Completing update for samba - 9/10 Completing update for samba-common - 10/10 Updated: samba 3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64 samba 3.0.7-2.FC2.i386 Dep Installed: samba-client 3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64 samba-swat 3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64 samba-common 3.0.7-2.FC2.x86_64 My yum.conf file looks like this: [main] cachedir=/var/cache/yum debuglevel=2 logfile=/var/log/yum.log pkgpolicy=newest distroverpkg=redhat-release tolerant=1 exactarch=1 retries=20 [base] name=Fedora Core $releasever - $basearch - Base baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/$releasever/$basearch/os/ [updates-released] name=Fedora Core $releasever - $basearch - Released Updates baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/$releasever/$basearch/ [i386-base] name=Fedora Core $releasever - i386 - Base baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/$releasever/i386/os/ [i386-updates-released] name=Fedora Core $releasever - i386 - Released Updates baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/$releasever/i386/ #[updates-testing] #name=Fedora Core $releasever - $basearch - Unreleased Updates #baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/testing/$releasever/$basearch/ #[development] #name=Fedora Core $releasever - Development Tree #baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/$basearch/ and, the final output from the rpm package query: [root]# rpm -a -q --queryformat "%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-%{arch}\n" | > egrep samba system-config-samba-1.2.9-2-noarch samba-swat-3.0.7-2.FC2-x86_64 samba-3.0.7-2.FC2-i386 samba-3.0.7-2.FC2-x86_64 samba-common-3.0.7-2.FC2-x86_64 samba-client-3.0.7-2.FC2-x86_64 [root]# I HAVE ONE QUESTION: Are there any consequences to leaving my yum.conf file like this? Thanks, Doug Morton
Since up2date has the same error, I suppose it needs to be reconfigured, too...
Should this be a up2date or yum bug, then? i.e. that on x86_64 have i386 repos listed as well? (OT: I'd also like to know why I need both i386 and x86_64 samba binaries...)
Reassigning to yum component. I think if the default x86_64 yum.conf included i386 repos, then yum will work better for people who install multilib.
Fedora Core 2 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and hasn't been resolved in the current FC3 updates or in the FC4 test release, reopen and change the version to match.
closing->wontfix