Bug 1327980 (python-pickleshare) - Review Request: python-pickleshare - Tiny 'shelve'-like database with concurrency support
Summary: Review Request: python-pickleshare - Tiny 'shelve'-like database with concurr...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: python-pickleshare
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-18 08:07 UTC by Igor Gnatenko
Modified: 2017-01-09 13:47 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-09 07:39:04 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Igor Gnatenko 2016-04-18 08:07:57 UTC
Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pickleshare.spec
SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pickleshare-0.7.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description:
PickleShare - a small 'shelve' like datastore with concurrency support.

Like shelve, a PickleShareDB object acts like a normal dictionary.
Unlike shelve, many processes can access the database simultaneously.
Changing a value in database is immediately visible to other processes
accessing the same database.

Concurrency is possible because the values are stored in separate files.
Hence the "database" is a directory where all files are governed by
PickleShare.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain

Comment 1 Igor Gnatenko 2016-04-18 08:14:42 UTC
For python2 it requires some another package, I will send it it review ASAP.

Comment 2 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2017-01-09 03:48:59 UTC
I assume you mean pathlib2; this package now exists, though it is missing a dependency on python2-six.

It seems like this review is outdated and the package is already accepted in bug 1379093.

Comment 3 Igor Gnatenko 2017-01-09 07:39:04 UTC
(In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #2)
> I assume you mean pathlib2; this package now exists, though it is missing a
> dependency on python2-six.
> 
> It seems like this review is outdated and the package is already accepted in
> bug 1379093.
Check the dates. Mine is open since April, that one is from September. 

Gil, can you check for duplicates before?

Comment 4 gil cattaneo 2017-01-09 13:47:41 UTC
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3)
> (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #2)
> > I assume you mean pathlib2; this package now exists, though it is missing a
> > dependency on python2-six.
> > 
> > It seems like this review is outdated and the package is already accepted in
> > bug 1379093.
> Check the dates. Mine is open since April, that one is from September. 
> 
> Gil, can you check for duplicates before?

Sorry for the inconvenience. But I do not have much time available,
to check for duplicates.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.