Hide Forgot
Description of problem: SELinux is preventing gst-plugin-scan from using the 'execstack' accesses on a process. ***** Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests ************************** If sie denken, dass es gst-plugin-scan standardmäßig erlaubt sein sollte, execstack Zugriff auf thumb_t Prozesse zu erhalten. Then sie sollten dies als Fehler melden. Um diesen Zugriff zu erlauben, können Sie ein lokales Richtlinien-Modul erstellen. Do allow this access for now by executing: # ausearch -c gst-plugin-scan --raw | audit2allow -M mypol # semodule -i mypol.pp Additional Information: Source Context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:thumb_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 Target Context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:thumb_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 Target Objects Unknown [ process ] Source gst-plugin-scan Source Path gst-plugin-scan Port <Unknown> Host (removed) Source RPM Packages Target RPM Packages Policy RPM selinux-policy-3.13.1-158.14.fc23.noarch Selinux Enabled True Policy Type targeted Enforcing Mode Enforcing Host Name (removed) Platform Linux (removed) 4.4.7-300.fc23.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Apr 13 02:52:52 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 Alert Count 8 First Seen 2016-04-19 13:09:11 CEST Last Seen 2016-04-23 12:53:01 CEST Local ID bcd1b6f7-1fce-4eaa-9bcf-f9ab8a1e8e89 Raw Audit Messages type=AVC msg=audit(1461408781.791:326): avc: denied { execstack } for pid=2562 comm="gst-plugin-scan" scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:thumb_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:thumb_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=process permissive=0 Hash: gst-plugin-scan,thumb_t,thumb_t,process,execstack Version-Release number of selected component: selinux-policy-3.13.1-158.14.fc23.noarch Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.6.4 hashmarkername: setroubleshoot kernel: 4.4.7-300.fc23.x86_64 type: libreport
Hi, Do you know, whats going on here? From security point of view, make stack executable is not good idea. If you don't see any issue with thumb and you just hit this SELinux msgs, I suggest to close this bug as WONTFIX.
*** Bug 1335646 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 23 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-12-20. Fedora 23 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
*** Bug 1593641 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This is not something that we should fix, you don't want you thumb executables doing execstack. Most likely nothing that you noticed broke.