Bug 1331182 - ISO installer broken for Sat 6.2 beta
Summary: ISO installer broken for Sat 6.2 beta
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Installer
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent vote
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: Katello QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-27 22:29 UTC by Corey Welton
Modified: 2019-11-14 07:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-07-27 11:04:16 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Corey Welton 2016-04-27 22:29:00 UTC
Description of problem:

A variety of changes in sat 6.2 have led to significant bitrot in the iso installer.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.2.0 Beta (ISO)

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Register box to prod
2.  Download and mount Sat 6.2 beta ISO
3.  attempt to run 'install_packages'

Actual results:


[root@rhsm-qe-3 foo]# ./install_packages 
This script will install the katello packages on the current machine.
   - Ensuring we are in an expected directory.
   - Copying installation files.
   - Creating a Repository File
   - Creating RHSCL Repository File
   - Checking to see if Katello is already installed.
   - Importing the gpg key.
   - katello is not yet installed, installing it.
warning: /opt/satellite/Packages/tfm-rubygem-powerbar-1.0.11-11.el7sat.noarch.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID f21541eb: NOKEY


Public key for tfm-rubygem-powerbar-1.0.11-11.el7sat.noarch.rpm is not installed
Error while executing command: 'yum install -y katello'


Expected results:

Installer works


Additional info:

I think it comes down to - 

* There's no reference to the new foreman installer/scenario stuff in
  the iso installer
* Scanning the source for the iso installer, it tells user at end to
  run katello-installer
* there's references in the --help akin to what I think is gutterball
  stuff that should no longer be there?
	 "  --enhanced_reporting  If
  	specified the enhanced reporting feature will be installed"
* Are we missing a gpgkey on package above?

Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2016-07-27 11:04:16 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1501


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.