Bug 133285 - RFE: Support APC MasterSwitch 7900
RFE: Support APC MasterSwitch 7900
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Cluster Suite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: clumanager (Show other bugs)
3
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Lon Hohberger
Cluster QE
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 131576
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-09-22 17:55 EDT by Lon Hohberger
Modified: 2009-04-16 16:15 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-11-09 13:12:50 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch implementing feature (4.75 KB, patch)
2004-09-22 18:09 EDT, Lon Hohberger
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Lon Hohberger 2004-09-22 17:55:42 EDT
The AP9211 and AP9212 switches are really old.  A recommendation from
APC was to support the 7900.  Multiple customers have reported that
they would like to see support for this switch in clumanager.
Comment 1 Lon Hohberger 2004-09-22 18:09:10 EDT
Created attachment 104148 [details]
Patch implementing feature

This patch enables support for the APC 7900 power switch.  This patch has been
regression tested against the APC 9225 switch; both work in both
"Administrator" and "Outlet User" modes.
Comment 3 Gerben Roest 2004-09-23 09:29:06 EDT
Will this patch also be available in binary form as an update of 
clumanager?
Comment 4 Lon Hohberger 2004-09-23 09:47:11 EDT
Far more likely than not, but I can't guarantee anything at this
point.  I really hope it does; lots of people want it.
Comment 9 John Flanagan 2004-12-20 22:40:16 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem 
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being 
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, 
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report 
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-491.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.