Description of problem: glibc-langpacks are not installed in the same way as other language packs are. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dnf-1.1.8-1.fc24.noarch glibc-2.23.1-6.fc24.x86_64 rpm-4.13.0-0.rc1.27.fc24.x86_64 dnf-langpacks-0.15.1-4.fc24.noarch How reproducible: on Fedora 24 fully updated (updates-testing) installation, on Fedora 24 Alpha build 7 live workstation instance Steps to Reproduce: 1. run `dnf langinstall da` or `dnf langinstall xx` with any glibc locale `xx` you don't have installed yet 2. check output before confirming Actual results: Many langpacks get installed, including eclipse, kde, libreoffice, hypen, hunspell; but the glibc-langpack-da doesn't get installed. Expected results: glibc-langpack-da (or any other locale) must get installed Additional info: Other langpacks work fine so I guess this is an issue in the glibc spec file. I might be wrong here though.
Proposed as a Blocker and Freeze Exception for 24-final by Fedora user genodeftest using the blocker tracking app because: This bug violates section "Critical path translations" [1] of the Fedora 24 Final Release Criteria. Since nobody else complained about this yet it seems that this issue doesn't affect installation by dracut but only changes to already installed system when using the dnf langpacks plugin. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria#Critical_path_translations
When using "dnf install langpacks-xx", everything works fine. (To delete packages, use "dnf remove langpacks-xx") "dnf langinstall xx" is deprecated.
[mfabian@Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_6 ~]$ sudo dnf install langpacks-da Last metadata expiration check: 0:09:38 ago on Thu May 12 08:12:18 2016. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: autocorr-da noarch 1:5.1.3.2-2.fc24 fedora 176 k glibc-langpack-da x86_64 2.23.1-5.fc24 fedora 251 k hyphen-da noarch 0.20070903-13.fc24 fedora 13 k kde-l10n-da noarch 16.04.0-1.fc24 fedora 12 M langpacks-da noarch 1.0-7.fc24 fedora 8.2 k libreoffice-langpack-da x86_64 1:5.1.3.2-2.fc24 fedora 6.9 M mythes-da noarch 0.20100629.15.16-10.fc24 fedora 824 k qt5-qttranslations noarch 5.6.0-2.fc24 fedora 1.4 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 8 Packages Total size: 22 M Total download size: 20 M Installed size: 63 M Is this ok [y/N]:
Please use new way of installing langpacks https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Language_Support_Using_Dnf I and Mike tried to debug this issue, if we are using glibc-2.23.1-5 then we can see [parag@localhost ~]$ sudo dnf install langpacks-da Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:57 ago on Thu May 12 11:58:59 2016. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: glibc-langpack-da x86_64 2.23.1-5.fc24 fedora 251 k hunspell-da noarch 1.7.42-6.fc24 fedora 336 k hyphen-da noarch 0.20070903-13.fc24 fedora 13 k langpacks-da noarch 1.0-7.fc24 fedora 8.2 k mythes-da noarch 0.20100629.15.16-10.fc24 fedora 824 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ But if you are already using glibc-2.23.1-6 then its not working now, see [parag@f24 ~]$ sudo dnf install langpacks-da Last metadata expiration check: 1:23:54 ago on Thu May 12 10:25:02 2016. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: calligra-l10n-da noarch 2.9.11-2.fc24 fedora 381 k eclipse-nls-da noarch 4.5.0.v20150804081228-3.fc24 fedora 1.6 M hunspell-da noarch 1.7.42-6.fc24 fedora 336 k hyphen-da noarch 0.20070903-13.fc24 fedora 13 k langpacks-da noarch 1.0-7.fc24 fedora 8.2 k mythes-da noarch 0.20100629.15.16-10.fc24 fedora 824 k tesseract-langpack-dan noarch 3.04.01-1.fc24 fedora 2.3 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================
(In reply to Mike FABIAN from comment #3) > [mfabian@Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_6 ~]$ sudo dnf install langpacks-da > Last metadata expiration check: 0:09:38 ago on Thu May 12 08:12:18 2016. > Dependencies resolved. > ============================================================================= > === > Package Arch Version Repository > > Size > ============================================================================= > === > Installing: > autocorr-da noarch 1:5.1.3.2-2.fc24 fedora > 176 k > glibc-langpack-da x86_64 2.23.1-5.fc24 fedora > 251 k > hyphen-da noarch 0.20070903-13.fc24 fedora > 13 k > kde-l10n-da noarch 16.04.0-1.fc24 fedora > 12 M > langpacks-da noarch 1.0-7.fc24 fedora > 8.2 k > libreoffice-langpack-da x86_64 1:5.1.3.2-2.fc24 fedora > 6.9 M > mythes-da noarch 0.20100629.15.16-10.fc24 fedora > 824 k > qt5-qttranslations noarch 5.6.0-2.fc24 fedora > 1.4 M > > Transaction Summary > ============================================================================= > === > Install 8 Packages > > Total size: 22 M > Total download size: 20 M > Installed size: 63 M > Is this ok [y/N]: This was tested on Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-24_Beta-1.6.iso (The released Beta). When I update everything with "dnf update", it does not work anymore: [mfabian@Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_6 ~]$ sudo dnf install langpacks-da Last metadata expiration check: 0:27:57 ago on Thu May 12 08:12:18 2016. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: autocorr-da noarch 1:5.1.3.2-2.fc24 updates-testing 176 k hyphen-da noarch 0.20070903-13.fc24 fedora 13 k langpacks-da noarch 1.0-7.fc24 fedora 8.2 k libreoffice-langpack-da x86_64 1:5.1.3.2-2.fc24 fedora 6.9 M mythes-da noarch 0.20100629.15.16-10.fc24 fedora 824 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 5 Packages Total download size: 7.9 M Installed size: 32 M Is this ok [y/N]:
(In reply to Mike FABIAN from comment #2) > When using "dnf install langpacks-xx", everything works fine. > (To delete packages, use "dnf remove langpacks-xx") > > "dnf langinstall xx" is deprecated. (In reply to Parag Nemade from comment #4) > Please use new way of installing langpacks > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Language_Support_Using_Dnf > > I and Mike tried to debug this issue, if we are using glibc-2.23.1-5 then we > can see Could you please orphan+remove the dnf-langpacks plugin then? (In reply to Parag Nemade from comment #4) > But if you are already using glibc-2.23.1-6 then its not working now, > […] That's exactly what I'm running into. Thanks for clarification.
Further looking into repodata files, I found fedora repodata is correct and listing all the rpm tags but updates-testing repodata do not contain any rpm tags like supplements, recommends, suggests, enhances. Looks like issue in repodata generation for updates-testing repo only and not related to glibc packaging.
(In reply to Christian Stadelmann from comment #6) > (In reply to Parag Nemade from comment #4) > > Please use new way of installing langpacks > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Language_Support_Using_Dnf > > > > I and Mike tried to debug this issue, if we are using glibc-2.23.1-5 then we > > can see > > Could you please orphan+remove the dnf-langpacks plugin then? > I will but nothing is perfect currently related to langpacks in Fedora. Langpacks are still not working via anaconda installation. Anyways, I decided to retire it from F25+ release.
Shall we mark this as CLOSED/NOTABUG given that the problem is not in glibc?
I am just waiting for someone from #fedora-releng to provide some information on this. Definitely this is not a glibc bug but bug is there in repodata generation.
(In reply to Parag Nemade from comment #10) > I am just waiting for someone from #fedora-releng to provide some > information on this. Definitely this is not a glibc bug but bug is there in > repodata generation. Sounds good. Please close it out once you get confirmation about the repo data issue. Thanks again for all of your help. Thanks also to Mike for reviewing the issue.
I got the information that the issue is in bodhi and bodhi runs on rhel7. I will move this bug to langpacks component for further tracking. Dropping blocker status as its not really a blocker.
On Fedora 26, I see this is fixed now See $ sudo dnf install langpacks-da Last metadata expiration check: 1:02:01 ago on Tue May 09 08:31:38 2017 IST. Dependencies resolved. =============================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =============================================================================== Installing: langpacks-da noarch 1.0-9.fc26 fedora 7.6 k Installing dependencies: autocorr-da noarch 1:5.3.2.1-2.fc26 updates-testing 178 k hunspell-da noarch 1.7.42-7.fc26 fedora 335 k hyphen-da noarch 0.20070903-14.fc26 fedora 12 k mythes-da noarch 0.20100629.15.16-11.fc26 fedora 823 k Installing weak dependencies: glibc-langpack-da x86_64 2.25-4.fc26 fedora 267 k kde-l10n-da noarch 16.12.3-1.fc26 updates-testing 12 M libreoffice-langpack-da x86_64 1:5.3.2.1-2.fc26 updates-testing 7.0 M tesseract-langpack-dan noarch 3.05.00-1.fc26 fedora 2.3 M Transaction Summary =============================================================================== Install 9 Packages Total download size: 23 M Installed size: 61 M Is this ok [y/N]: Please reopen if needs any more fixes or file a new bug.