Bug 133594 - newer RLIMIT_ values not handled
Summary: newer RLIMIT_ values not handled
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: strace
Version: 3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Roland McGrath
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-09-24 23:55 UTC by Ulrich Drepper
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-10-06 22:11:48 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to add support for the missing RLIMIT_ values (424 bytes, patch)
2004-09-24 23:56 UTC, Ulrich Drepper 		no flags Details | Diff
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2005:131 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE strace bug fix update 2005-05-19 04:00:00 UTC

Description Ulrich Drepper 2004-09-24 23:55:28 UTC 
Description of problem:
Some of the newer RLIMIT_ values are not handled.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
strace-4.5.7-2

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.strace code using RLIMIT_LOCKS
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
getrlimit(0xa /* RLIMIT_??? */, {rlim_cur=RLIM_INFINITY,
rlim_max=RLIM_INFINITY}) = 0


Expected results:
getrlimit(RLIMIT_LOCKS, {rlim_cur=RLIM_INFINITY,
rlim_max=RLIM_INFINITY}) = 0

Additional info:
I'll attach a patch.
Comment 1 Ulrich Drepper 2004-09-24 23:56:17 UTC 
Created attachment 104299 [details]
Patch to add support for the missing RLIMIT_ values
Comment 2 Roland McGrath 2004-10-06 22:11:48 UTC 
The patch is in upstream.
Comment 3 Tim Powers 2005-05-19 21:10:00 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-131.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.