Bug 1336808 - RFE: Provide uncached per-process memory metrics
Summary: RFE: Provide uncached per-process memory metrics
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pcp
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: pcp-maint
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-05-17 13:31 UTC by Marko Myllynen
Modified: 2020-09-21 05:29 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-21 05:29:55 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Marko Myllynen 2016-05-17 13:31:18 UTC
Description of problem:
Consider the following case:

# swapoff -a
# free -m
              total        used        free	 shared  buff/cache   available
Mem:           7686        1522        5244         312         918        5619
Swap:             0           0           0
# awk '/VmSwap/ && $2>0 {print}' /proc/*/status | sort -nr | head -n 5
VmSwap:      252 kB
VmSwap:      128 kB
VmSwap:      120 kB
VmSwap:      100 kB
VmSwap:       92 kB
# 

VmSwap being > 0 is caused by mm counter caching and the values might be slightly off. A precise snapshot of a process memory use can be found in /proc/<pid>/smaps or /proc/<pid>/pagemap. pgmap(1), included in libpagemap, gets its data (USS/PSS/SWAP/RES/SHR) from /proc/<pid>/pagemap and should be accurate.

It would be nice to have such uncached metrics available from PCP as well.

Comment 1 Jerome Marchand 2016-05-17 13:40:14 UTC
I don't know what are the requirement of pcp, but please note that getting the mm usage from smaps or pagemap is much more expensive than from status.

Comment 2 Marko Myllynen 2016-05-17 13:43:23 UTC
(In reply to Jerome Marchand from comment #1)
> I don't know what are the requirement of pcp, but please note that getting
> the mm usage from smaps or pagemap is much more expensive than from status.

Good point - this can be seen already by running pgmap, it takes a few moments before getting any data. On the PCP side I'd expect these to be available somewhere under proc.psinfo so certainly not being logged by default.

Thanks.

Comment 3 Fedora End Of Life 2016-11-25 09:03:46 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '23'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 4 Fedora End Of Life 2016-12-20 20:32:16 UTC
Fedora 23 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-12-20. Fedora 23 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Comment 5 Nathan Scott 2019-03-05 04:40:44 UTC
There is nowadays a smaps_rollup file which is lighter weight to sample, if anyone has cycles to hack on this.

Comment 6 Nathan Scott 2020-09-21 05:29:55 UTC
This was tackled awhile back...

commit 21cdcaa07a64cc7f6b8aa9ae7b3ecbe60f4d2a78
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans>
Date:   Fri Mar 20 11:28:43 2020 +1100

    pmdaproc: support proc.smaps.* metrics from /proc/pid/smaps_rollup
    
    Resolves https://github.com/performancecopilot/pcp/issues/569


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.