Bug 134444 - SO_PEERSEC definition missing
SO_PEERSEC definition missing
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: glibc-kernheaders (Show other bugs)
3
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: David Woodhouse
Brian Brock
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 156322
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-10-02 15:50 EDT by Ulrich Drepper
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2005-716
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-05 08:19:56 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Ulrich Drepper 2004-10-02 15:50:56 EDT
Description of problem:
The definition of SO_PEERSEC in <asm/socket.h> is missing.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.87

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.grep SO_PEERSEC /usr/include/asm/socket.h
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
noting

Expected results:
#define SO_PEERSEC              31

Additional info:
We really need this definition to get strace compiled correctly (and
possibly some other code).
Comment 4 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-05 08:04:36 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-716.html
Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-05 08:19:56 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-716.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.