RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1349942 - Latest SRPMS for rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client released to git.centos.org require unreleased glib2
Summary: Latest SRPMS for rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client released to git.centos.org ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rhel-server-atomic
Version: 7.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Colin Walters
QA Contact: atomic-bugs@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-06-24 15:25 UTC by Johnny Hughes
Modified: 2017-07-31 18:47 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-14 14:10:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
lorax srpm (161.92 KB, application/x-rpm)
2016-06-29 23:40 UTC, Colin Walters 		no flags Details
View All

Description Johnny Hughes 2016-06-24 15:25:23 UTC 
Description of problem:

rpm-ostree-2016.3.1.g5bd7211-1.atomic.el7.src.rpm  and rpm-ostree-client-2016.3.1.g5bd7211-2.atomic.el7.1.src.rpm require a glib2 > 2.44.0 as evidenced by this error while building:

package 'gio-unix-2.0>=2.44.0' not found

see this CentOS build log:

http://buildlogs.centos.org/cah-0.0.1/rpm-ostree/20160624144611/2016.3.1.g5bd7211-1.atomic.el7.x86_64/build.log
Comment 1 Johnny Hughes 2016-06-24 15:35:34 UTC 
I forgot to mention .. the latest released glib2 in RHEL 7 or CentOS 7 is:

glib2-2.42.2-5.el7.src.rpm

which provides

pkgconfig(gio-unix-2.0) = 2.42.2
Comment 2 Colin Walters 2016-06-24 15:50:42 UTC 
Right.  I suspect we don't have a process for releasing all override SRPMs which are in the Atomic Host content set.  The installer ISO will also need a newer lorax.

In the CAHC/Devel (upstream of downstream) content set we do:

https://github.com/CentOS/sig-atomic-buildscripts/blob/master/overlay.yml#L99

Literally, a single line to automatically track, rebuild and ship Fedora 24's glib2.  

Just noting this as relevant for how this new dependency appeared in development - we do need the actual RHEL sources, and to ensure the process provides that.
Comment 4 Jon Disnard 2016-06-24 16:57:37 UTC 
Maybe we can put the override SRPMs in the altsrc channel?
Comment 5 Johnny Hughes 2016-06-24 21:07:49 UTC 
glib2-2.46.2-2.fc23.src.rpm  <==> That version (from Fedora koji) would work to get the build and seems to be close to what is used.  I wonder if there are any incompatibilities with CentOS 7 if I use that.
Comment 6 Jason Brooks 2016-06-29 16:05:05 UTC 
(In reply to Colin Walters from comment #2)
> Right.  I suspect we don't have a process for releasing all override SRPMs
> which are in the Atomic Host content set.  The installer ISO will also need
> a newer lorax.

Do you know which version of lorax we need?
Comment 7 Colin Walters 2016-06-29 23:40:35 UTC 
Created attachment 1174278 [details]
lorax srpm

This version should work.
Comment 8 Colin Walters 2016-06-30 00:34:13 UTC 
(In reply to Jon Disnard from comment #4)
> Maybe we can put the override SRPMs in the altsrc channel?

I don't know what altsrc is, but it sounds like anything that allows providing sources should work.
Comment 9 Jon Disnard 2016-07-12 14:12:38 UTC 
(In reply to Colin Walters from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jon Disnard from comment #4)
> > Maybe we can put the override SRPMs in the altsrc channel?
> 
> I don't know what altsrc is, but it sounds like anything that allows
> providing sources should work.

Yes indeed, altsrc is thingy that ships source packages to CentOS project. But unfortunately I suspect it doesn't consider build overrides. This is not something rel-eng can just simply push unilaterally. After an internal discussion with MikeM, it looks like it would require PM to bless.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.