Bug 136471 - Inconsistencies between manpages and binaries
Summary: Inconsistencies between manpages and binaries
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: netpbm
Version: 2
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jindrich Novy
QA Contact: Ben Levenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-10-20 11:19 UTC by Bert DeKnuydt
Modified: 2013-07-02 23:03 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: 10.25-3
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-10-25 13:58:20 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Bert DeKnuydt 2004-10-20 11:19:51 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3)
Gecko/20040922

Description of problem:

Man pages for some pam-tools are installed, but not the binaries.

E.g.: there is a pamsumm manpage, but no equivalent binary.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
netpbm-progs-10.19-7

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -ql netpbm-progs-10.19-7 | less
2.
3.
    

Actual Results:  You see some inconsistencies between what is
available in the manpages and what is available as binary.

Expected Results:  No inconsistencies.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jindrich Novy 2004-10-25 13:58:20 UTC
Bert,

in the current netpbm release (10.25) I have found the following
conflicts:

pcdovtoppm
ppmsvgalib
vidtoppm

These man pages do not have their binary so I deleted them. Note that
I didn't delete pamsumm man page because the binary for it is present
in netpbm-10.25. Furthermore the man pages are now in troff format
instead of pure ASCII.

Thanks,
Jindrich


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.