Keys: D - Display mode R - Restart statistics Q - Quit Packets Pings Hostname %Loss Rcv Snt Last Best Avg Worst 1. 192.168.217.1 0% 0 0 -501530 0 0 0 2. 12.46.108.97 0% 0 0 -501576 0 0 0 3. 12.46.111.243 0% 0 0 -501629 0 0 0 Why are those counters signed numbers anyway ? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Can you tell me how to reproduce it? And i agree, signed counters don't make much sense here, but an overflow still would probably happen, just no negative numbers then... Read ya, Phil
I saw it happen on a very congested hotel wireless network. Haven't managed to reproduce it under other conditions.
I've tried to reproduce it here but without any luck. If you happen to find a reproducible case please let me know and i'll give it another shot. Read ya, Phil
I guess I've not been on a similarly crappy network since :-) Might be worth bringing this up upstream, as it involves changing prototypes of various functions etc, not just a simple %d -> %ud conversion.
Fixed (Bugzilla #136729)