Bug 1369554 - [RFE] Allow Group Access to Report Schedules
Summary: [RFE] Allow Group Access to Report Schedules
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Reporting
Version: 5.5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: GA
: cfme-future
Assignee: John Hardy
QA Contact: Jiri Stefanisin
URL:
Whiteboard: report:rbac
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-08-23 18:16 UTC by Dustin Scott
Modified: 2020-12-14 07:41 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-10-24 14:08:06 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dustin Scott 2016-08-23 18:16:01 UTC
-What is the nature and description of the request?
Allow group access to report schedules to make consistent with the rest of reporting functions, which are group-based.
  
-Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Shared access to schedules allows customer to track schedules, and edit schedules in one place, and ensures no overlap.  The lack of group access to MiqReport schedules is inconsistent with the rest of reporting, which is confusing.
  
-How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)

Update the /var/www/miq/vmdb/app/presenters/tree_builder_report_schedules.rb following line to reflect group access instead of user access:

objects = MiqSchedule.all(:conditions => ['towhat=? AND userid=?', 'MiqReport', User.current_user.userid])

Looking through the miq_schedules table, this would need to have a groupid or something similar added to it.
  
-For each functional requirement listed, specify how Red Hat and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Check group access following implementation of RFE errata.
  
-Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat Bugzilla?
I have not found one.
  
-Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies and which release would they like to target (i.e. RHEL5, RHEL6)?
No specific timelines.
  
-Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?
Yes, sales in involved.  Current ongoing engagement with consultant on site.
  
-List any affected packages or components.
cfme-5.5.3.4-1.el7cf.x86_64
cfme-appliance-5.5.3.4-1.el7cf.x86_64

Comment 6 Greg Scott 2017-10-24 14:04:09 UTC
Looks like we can close this RFE.  Here's an extract from the relevant support case comment:

"Team,

I think this case can be closed. There are 3 groups created in CF for
governance reporting and other governance tasks. ..."


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.