Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.6.1.2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Do a provision of for example three instances 2. Provision fails 3. Do that provision again, but without fails Actual results: Three instances that are successfully provided have name like $instance_0003 - $instance_0005. Expected results: When provision fails it shouldn't be counted and next provision number in name should start where this provision did. Additional info:
This feature is currently working as designed and there are no plans to change it at this time. The implementation is designed to ensure unique values are provided for VM names as well as being efficient. To provide this functionality only the last returned index value is stored for a given naming pattern. When a new value is requested for a pattern the current value is incremented and returned. This is performed while locking the row in the database to ensure sequential access to the next value. There is no support for reusing values due to failed provision requests.