Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. dnf update && dnf install java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless Actual results: Error : package java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.91-7.b14.fc24.i686 requires java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.91-7.b14.fc24, but none of the providers can be installed Expected results: Successful installation Additional info: java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.102-1.b14.fc24.i686.rpm is not in the updates repository. 64 bits and 32 bits java-1.8.0-openjdk rpm packages have not the same version : dnf info java-1.8.0-openjdk Vérification de l'expiration des métadonnées effectuée il y a 0:04:33 sur Wed Sep 7 09:16:39 2016. Paquets disponibles Nom : java-1.8.0-openjdk Architectur : i686 Époque : 1 Version : 1.8.0.91 Révision : 7.b14.fc24 Taille : 232 k Dépôt : fedora Résumé : OpenJDK Runtime Environment URL : http://openjdk.java.net/ Licence : ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and GPL+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2 with exceptions and LGPL+ and LGPLv2 and MPLv1.0 and MPLv1.1 and Public Domain and W3C Description : The OpenJDK runtime environment. Nom : java-1.8.0-openjdk Architectur : x86_64 Époque : 1 Version : 1.8.0.102 Révision : 1.b14.fc24 Taille : 228 k Dépôt : updates Résumé : OpenJDK Runtime Environment URL : http://openjdk.java.net/ Licence : ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and GPL+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2 with exceptions and LGPL+ and LGPLv2 and MPLv1.0 and MPLv1.1 and Public Domain and W3C Description : The OpenJDK runtime environment. 64 bits and 32 bits java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless rpm packages have the same version : dnf info java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless Vérification de l'expiration des métadonnées effectuée il y a 0:06:41 sur Wed Sep 7 09:16:39 2016. Paquets installés Nom : java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless Architectur : x86_64 Époque : 1 Version : 1.8.0.102 Révision : 1.b14.fc24 Taille : 103 M Dépôt : @System Depuis le d : updates Résumé : OpenJDK Runtime Environment URL : http://openjdk.java.net/ Licence : ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and GPL+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2 with exceptions and LGPL+ and LGPLv2 and MPLv1.0 and MPLv1.1 and Public Domain and W3C Description : The OpenJDK runtime environment without audio and video support. Paquets disponibles Nom : java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless Architectur : i686 Époque : 1 Version : 1.8.0.102 Révision : 1.b14.fc24 Taille : 31 M Dépôt : updates Résumé : OpenJDK Runtime Environment URL : http://openjdk.java.net/ Licence : ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and GPL+ and GPLv2 and GPLv2 with exceptions and LGPL+ and LGPLv2 and MPLv1.0 and MPLv1.1 and Public Domain and W3C Description : The OpenJDK runtime environment without audio and video support.
Hello. I'm finding the report a bit confusing (sorry). This is probably fedora release engineering issue, or maybe also dnf issue or really maybe java issue First to clarify: When you are installing not-your-architecture, but still compatible one (as you do with i686 on x86_64) thngs may go wrong. 1) dnf install java-1.8.0-openjdk.i686 Error: package java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.91-7.b14.fc24.i686 requires java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless = 1:1.8.0.91-7.b14.fc24, but none of the providers can be installed Imho dnf is trying to satisfy java-1.8.0-openjdk.i686's dependency of headless one by x64. And that is failing... Not exactly sure why. 2)However when you go with dnf install java-1.8.0-openjdk.i686 java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless.i686 Last metadata expiration check: 1:42:25 ago on Wed Sep 7 10:31:44 2016. Dependencies resolved. ======================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ======================================================================================== Installing: giflib i686 4.1.6-15.fc24 fedora 45 k java-1.8.0-openjdk i686 1:1.8.0.91-7.b14.fc24 fedora 232 k java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless i686 1:1.8.0.91-7.b14.fc24 fedora 31 M Skipping packages with conflicts:(add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless i686 1:1.8.0.102-1.b14.fc24 updates 31 M Transaction Summary ======================================================================================== Install 3 Packages Skip 1 Package The result is much better. But you are very right that versions are wrong. I'm pretty sure my updates were correct: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7e41b6802e and on all arches: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=794434 3) Now - last of all: My specs http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/java-1.8.0-openjdk.git/tree/java-1.8.0-openjdk.spec#n655 are requesting headless *without* architecture ( %{_isa} ) macro. That shouldbe correct and aligned with packaging guidelines. So if 3 is the fault, and I should depend with isa... it wil break guidelines (?) if 1 is the fault then dnf need some fix (dnf) And if 3 is the fault, then i686 build did not make it to repos.... (release-engineering) Thoughts?
hmm.. Interesting is that the installed i686 packages are going form *fedora* repo, but the one with missing depndencises is going from *updates* repo. Isn't 32bit fedora already "dead"? That means the update repos do not work?
jiri vanek, you're right. The problem is that updates repository contains only the 64 bits version java-1.8.0-openjdk rpm (version 102). So dnf find the 32 bits version rpm in fedora repository only (version 91). To install the package, i've downloaded and installed the java-1.8.0-openjdk.i686 (version 102) package from the fedora 24 i686 updates repository. To solve definitively this issue, you should add the rpm java-1.8.0-openjdk.i686 (version 102) to x86_64 updates repository too.
Ok. It looks like multilib openjdk is intentionally out of play: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5762 As you can use it by direct download from koji and localinstall, I will close as not a bug.
it's not a bug, just a missing package. Who can add the missing package in fedora 24 x86_64 updates repository ?
No one. Openjdk is blacklisted on multilib, On 32b fedora, the update is normally available.