Bug 1376809 - katello-installer not replaced by satellite-installer in installation guide
Summary: katello-installer not replaced by satellite-installer in installation guide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Docs Install Guide
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
low vote
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Stephen Wadeley
QA Contact: Andrew Dahms
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-16 12:48 UTC by Fred van Zwieten
Modified: 2016-09-26 11:50 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-09-26 11:50:16 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fred van Zwieten 2016-09-16 12:48:43 UTC
Document URL: 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-satellite/6.2/single/installation-guide

Section Number and Name: 
search for "katello-installer" (5 hits)

Describe the issue:
katello-installer is replaced by satellite-installer.

Suggestions for improvement:
replace katello-installer by satellite-installer

Additional information:

Comment 1 Stephen Wadeley 2016-09-16 13:01:14 UTC
Hello

katello-installer is the command to use when you have a 6.1 system and 6.1 system are mentioned in the upgrade procedures.

Did you check the context of those commands?

I found the first two in "Upgrading Satellite Server" before you disable the 6.1 repos, while you are still checking the system is up to date.


In "Upgrading To Disconnected Satellite Server version 6.2" there is one

katello-installer --capsule-dns-managed=false --capsule-dhcp-managed=false


There are two in "Upgrading a Self-Registered Satellite Server"
before you disable the 6.1 repos, while you are still checking the system is up to date.

I suggest this is NOTABUG

The self-reg procedure was the last to be worked on, so its a bit better, and I have a bug to review them all for consistency.

Bug 1367674 – Review upgrade procedures

Comment 2 Fred van Zwieten 2016-09-26 11:50:16 UTC
I agree. Sorry for the noise.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.