Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1376993

Summary: [DOCS] [7.3] Document Docker on RHEL Workstation
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Component: doc-RHEL-AtomicAssignee: Yoana Ruseva <yruseva>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Severity: low Docs Contact: Vikram Goyal <vigoyal>
Priority: low    
Version: 7.2CC: bbreard, cnegus, dwalsh, lsm5, rhartman, yruseva, zdover
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Documentation, Extras
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-24 12:41:20 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Vikram Goyal 2016-09-17 10:53:53 UTC 
Need to define how docker is different on a RHEL workstation than a RHEL server. This includes any different repositories you need to start and different package names. Need to determine if our rhel images are based on server or workstation.
Comment 2 Yoana Ruseva 2016-09-26 13:42:09 UTC 
Hi Dan, is there any practical difference between docker on Workstation and docker on Server? I have confirmed with Lokesh that the RPMs are the same for both variants. The only thing I can think of is having to enable some special repositories.
Comment 3 Daniel Walsh 2016-09-26 14:35:26 UTC 
No they are the same RPMs, but getting access to the RPMS via subscription-manager could be a problem.
Comment 4 Yoana Ruseva 2016-09-26 16:22:26 UTC 
On a RHEL Workstation that I registered to the Extras and the Optional channels, I didn't find docker available:

# subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-7-workstation-extras-rpms
# yum install docker
....
No package docker available. 

and then:

# subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-7-workstation-optional-rpms
# yum install docker
....
No package docker available. 

How can I obtain the RPMs?
Comment 5 Lokesh Mandvekar 2016-09-26 16:33:52 UTC 
Hi Ryan, is it possible we could tag docker rpms into workstation repos, or any other way to get this going perhaps?
Comment 6 Yoana Ruseva 2016-09-26 16:37:58 UTC 
Ben, how would a customer obtain the RPMs?
Comment 7 Vikram Goyal 2016-10-24 12:41:20 UTC 
Moved to 7.3.2