Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Samba/CTDB 4.2 as shipped in 7.2 updates repo suffers from Samba bug 11844 in a CTDB cluster. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11844 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Installed Packages Name : samba Arch : x86_64 Version : 4.2.10 Release : 7.el7_2 Size : 1.8 M Repo : installed From repo : updates Summary : Server and Client software to interoperate with Windows machines URL : http://www.samba.org/ Licence : GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ Description : Samba is the standard Windows interoperability suite of programs : for Linux and Unix. Installed Packages Name : ctdb Arch : x86_64 Version : 4.2.10 Release : 7.el7_2 Size : 1.2 M Repo : installed From repo : updates Summary : A Clustered Database based on Samba's Trivial Database (TDB) URL : http://www.samba.org/ Licence : GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ Description : CTDB is a cluster implementation of the TDB database used by Samba : and other projects to store temporary data. If an application is : already using TDB for temporary data it is very easy to convert : that application to be cluster aware and use CTDB instead. How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Set up Samba and CTDB on a clustered/distributed filesystem 2. Throw 200-300 production users on mixed XP/W7 clients at the FS 3. Observe random failures accessing files, eg profile files not loading, XLS files not accessible, stuck locks, corrupted EACLs, and "assert failed" in samba logs as described in Samba bugzilla Actual results: Failures to access files as expected, samba log: [2016/09/20 16:04:15.322530, 0] ../source3/smbd/oplock.c:193(update_num_read_oplocks) PANIC: assert failed at ../source3/smbd/oplock.c(193): d->num_share_modes == 1 [2016/09/20 16:04:15.322556, 0] ../source3/lib/util.c:788(smb_panic_s3) PANIC (pid 21800): assert failed: d->num_share_modes == 1 [2016/09/20 16:04:15.323100, 0] ../source3/lib/util.c:899(log_stack_trace) BACKTRACE: 26 stack frames: #0 /lib64/libsmbconf.so.0(log_stack_trace+0x1a) [0x7f63b3ba41da] #1 /lib64/libsmbconf.so.0(smb_panic_s3+0x20) [0x7f63b3ba42b0] #2 /lib64/libsamba-util.so.0(smb_panic+0x2f) [0x7f63b5a2891f] #3 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(update_num_read_oplocks+0xf9) [0x7f63b5635929] #4 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(+0x1119d2) [0x7f63b55e09d2] #5 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(+0x114459) [0x7f63b55e3459] #6 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(create_file_default+0x1cf) [0x7f63b55e449f] #7 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(+0x1ed24e) [0x7f63b56bc24e] #8 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(smb_vfs_call_create_file+0xd8) [0x7f63b55eace8] #9 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(reply_ntcreate_and_X+0x4b6) [0x7f63b55a1326] #10 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(+0x12cdb3) [0x7f63b55fbdb3] #11 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(+0x12ea60) [0x7f63b55fda60] #12 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(+0x130131) [0x7f63b55ff131] #13 /lib64/libsmbconf.so.0(run_events_poll+0x16c) [0x7f63b3bba07c] #14 /lib64/libsmbconf.so.0(+0x372d0) [0x7f63b3bba2d0] #15 /lib64/libtevent.so.0(_tevent_loop_once+0x8d) [0x7f63b25d636d] #16 /lib64/libtevent.so.0(tevent_common_loop_wait+0x1b) [0x7f63b25d650b] #17 /usr/lib64/samba/libsmbd-base-samba4.so(smbd_process+0x6d9) [0x7f63b5600419] #18 /usr/sbin/smbd(+0xae44) [0x7f63b608ce44] #19 /lib64/libsmbconf.so.0(run_events_poll+0x16c) [0x7f63b3bba07c] #20 /lib64/libsmbconf.so.0(+0x372d0) [0x7f63b3bba2d0] #21 /lib64/libtevent.so.0(_tevent_loop_once+0x8d) [0x7f63b25d636d] #22 /lib64/libtevent.so.0(tevent_common_loop_wait+0x1b) [0x7f63b25d650b] #23 /usr/sbin/smbd(main+0x1501) [0x7f63b6089361] #24 /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f63b2231b15] #25 /usr/sbin/smbd(+0x7765) [0x7f63b6089765] [2016/09/20 16:04:15.323170, 0] ../source3/lib/dumpcore.c:318(dump_core) dumping core in /var/log/samba/cores/smbd Expected results: Ability to consistently access files via SAMBA/CTDB cluster Additional info: Please backport patch from bugzilla.samba.org to updates
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1381688 ***
Hi, If this bug has already been closed, why is the version in the repos still the same as the version the bug report relates to? Best regards Alex
Thanks very much! Alex