Bug 1379151 - [RFE] - QoS dialog should contain more context sensitive help for the options.
Summary: [RFE] - QoS dialog should contain more context sensitive help for the options.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: ovirt-engine
Classification: oVirt
Component: Frontend.WebAdmin
Version: 4.0.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
high vote
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: eraviv
QA Contact: Lukas Svaty
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-25 12:48 UTC by Yaniv Lavi
Modified: 2020-06-26 16:37 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-01 14:46:43 UTC
oVirt Team: Virt
rbarry: ovirt-4.5?
rule-engine: planning_ack?
rule-engine: devel_ack?
rule-engine: testing_ack?

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Yaniv Lavi 2016-09-25 12:48:14 UTC 
Description of problem:
QoS dialog should contain more context sensitive help for the options. Options like CPU shares, capping and link sharing are not clear and some info can really help with admin decisions and not needing the docs for every action.
Comment 1 Yaniv Kaul 2018-05-21 10:45:26 UTC 
Dan - please target or close.
Comment 2 Dan Kenigsberg 2018-05-29 08:47:49 UTC 
Eitan, you wanted to improve QoS UX. Would you discuss the subject with ylavi?
Comment 3 Red Hat Bugzilla Rules Engine 2018-05-29 08:47:55 UTC 
This request has been proposed for two releases. This is invalid flag usage. The ovirt-future release flag has been cleared. If you wish to change the release flag, you must clear one release flag and then set the other release flag to ?.
Comment 4 Michal Skrivanek 2020-03-17 12:16:59 UTC 
deprecating SLA team usage, moving to Virt
Comment 5 Michal Skrivanek 2020-03-19 15:40:50 UTC 
We didn't get to this bug for more than 2 years, and it's not being considered for the upcoming 4.4. It's unlikely that it will ever be addressed so I'm suggesting to close it.
If you feel this needs to be addressed and want to work on it please remove cond nack and target accordingly.
Comment 6 Michal Skrivanek 2020-04-01 14:46:43 UTC 
Closing old bug. Please reopen if still relevant/you want to work on it.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.