Bug 1382084 - [Perf] : Poor large file performance on Ganesha v4 mounts compared to Gluster NFS
Summary: [Perf] : Poor large file performance on Ganesha v4 mounts compared to Gluster...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: nfs-ganesha
Version: rhgs-3.2
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Girjesh Rajoria
QA Contact: Rahul Hinduja
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-10-05 17:02 UTC by Ambarish
Modified: 2019-08-16 04:33 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-08-16 04:33:12 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1334907 0 high CLOSED [Perf] : Multi-fd support on Ganesha v4 disables AFR eager-locking affecting performance 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1334907

Description Ambarish 2016-10-05 17:02:55 UTC
Description of problem:
-----------------------

**The intent of opening this BZ is to compare large file I/O throughputs on gNFS and Ganesha v4 mounts,and to reduce the magnitude of difference between the two. **

Large file I/O is comparatively slower on Ganesha v4 mounts than gNFS,under the exact same workload and environment.

Details in comments.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
-------------------------------------------------------------

nfs-ganesha-2.4.0-2.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-ganesha-3.8.4-2.el7rhgs.x86_64

How reproducible:
-----------------

100%

Steps to Reproduce:
-------------------

Run iozone in a distributed multithreaded way from 1/4 clients : 

iozone -+m <conf file> -+h <hostname> -C -w -c -e -i 0 -+n -r 64k -s 8g -t 16

Actual results:
---------------

There is a difference in throughputs (almost 75% in some cases) between gNFS and Ganesha v4 under the same workload. 

Expected results:
-----------------

The difference between the two should be not be as pronounced as is being seen atm.

Additional info:
----------------

Vol Type  : 2*2,Dist Rep
Client and Server OS : RHEL 7

Server Profiles will be updated once https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381353 is fixed.

Comment 13 surabhi 2016-11-29 10:07:31 UTC
As per the triaging we all have the agreement that this BZ has to be fixed in rhgs-3.2.0. Providing qa_ack


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.