Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1383702

Summary:	Errata update date on CDN not valid and break filter results
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Franck Grosjean <franck.grosjean>
Component:	Content Views	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	6.2.2	CC:	bbuckingham, fcami, fgrosjea, franck.grosjean, rnester, sgraf, tmlcoch, tstrachota, xdmoon
Target Milestone:	Unspecified
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-10-13 21:02:00 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Franck Grosjean 2016-10-11 13:40:06 UTC

Description of problem:

Updated date from an errata published on CDN is not valid facing Issued date

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Any component connected to CDN

How reproducible:

sync sat6 against Rhel6 rpms repos and check errata RHBA-2015:1426

----------------------------------------------------------
hammer erratum info --id RHBA-2015:1426 --repository-id 2
ID:          ff2f1623-0fe6-4c7b-b32d-9530b02237bd
Errata ID:   RHBA-2015:1426
Title:       grub bug fix update
Type:        bugfix
Severity:    
Issued:      2015-07-22  <---- match info from access.redhat.com
Updated:     2015-04-07  <---- Back to the futur ?

Description: The grub packages provide Grand Unified Boot Loader (GRUB), a boot loader
capable of booting a wide variety of operating systems.
----------------------------------------------------------

Steps to Reproduce:
1.install sat6
2.sync rhel 6server rpms repos
3.check issued/update date on errata RHBA-2015:1426

Actual results:

Update date have precedence on issued date and it's not possible to rely on filter feature

Expected results:

Update/issued date should match information found on access.redhat.com (7/22/2015)

Additional info:

Comment 1 Tomas Strachota 2016-10-12 13:29:30 UTC

I checked the erratum data on CDN and the date is wrong there. Satellite correctly interprets wrong data.

Comment 8 Tomas Mlcoch 2016-10-13 07:15:58 UTC

Metadata for that erratum was corrected.

Comment 9 rnester 2016-10-13 15:28:51 UTC

Currently, we do not perform the type of comparison that you're referencing. Please open an RFE for this test comparison at https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/CONTENT and we'll add it to our backlog.

Comment 10 Brad Buckingham 2016-10-13 19:36:58 UTC

Based on the discussion, should this bugzilla be closed:notabug?

Comment 11 Franck Grosjean 2016-10-13 21:02:00 UTC

Thank you, I'll open a RFE. This bugzilla could be closed

Comment 12 Tomas Mlcoch 2016-10-17 06:50:28 UTC

The metadata was wrong and was corrected -> this was a bug.
I've also opened an RFE to content testing team to test sanity of dates before for every released erratum.