Bug 1383702 - Errata update date on CDN not valid and break filter results
Summary: Errata update date on CDN not valid and break filter results
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Content Views
Version: 6.2.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
urgent vote
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-10-11 13:40 UTC by Franck Grosjean
Modified: 2020-09-10 09:50 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-13 21:02:00 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Franck Grosjean 2016-10-11 13:40:06 UTC
Description of problem:

Updated date from an errata published on CDN is not valid facing Issued date

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

Any component connected to CDN

How reproducible:

sync sat6 against Rhel6 rpms repos and check errata RHBA-2015:1426

----------------------------------------------------------
hammer erratum info --id RHBA-2015:1426 --repository-id 2
ID:          ff2f1623-0fe6-4c7b-b32d-9530b02237bd
Errata ID:   RHBA-2015:1426
Title:       grub bug fix update
Type:        bugfix
Severity:    
Issued:      2015-07-22  <---- match info from access.redhat.com
Updated:     2015-04-07  <---- Back to the futur ?

Description: The grub packages provide Grand Unified Boot Loader (GRUB), a boot loader
capable of booting a wide variety of operating systems.
----------------------------------------------------------

Steps to Reproduce:
1.install sat6
2.sync rhel 6server rpms repos
3.check issued/update date on errata RHBA-2015:1426

Actual results:

Update date have precedence on issued date and it's not possible to rely on filter feature

Expected results:

Update/issued date should match information found on access.redhat.com (7/22/2015)

Additional info:

Comment 1 Tomas Strachota 2016-10-12 13:29:30 UTC
I checked the erratum data on CDN and the date is wrong there. Satellite correctly interprets wrong data.

Comment 8 Tomas Mlcoch 2016-10-13 07:15:58 UTC
Metadata for that erratum was corrected.

Comment 9 rnester 2016-10-13 15:28:51 UTC
Currently, we do not perform the type of comparison that you're referencing. Please open an RFE for this test comparison at https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/CONTENT and we'll add it to our backlog.

Comment 10 Brad Buckingham 2016-10-13 19:36:58 UTC
Based on the discussion, should this bugzilla be closed:notabug?

Comment 11 Franck Grosjean 2016-10-13 21:02:00 UTC
Thank you, I'll open a RFE. This bugzilla could be closed

Comment 12 Tomas Mlcoch 2016-10-17 06:50:28 UTC
The metadata was wrong and was corrected -> this was a bug.
I've also opened an RFE to content testing team to test sanity of dates before for every released erratum.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.