Bug 1385682 - [ceph-iscsi-ansible]: "ceph-iscsi-gw.yml" installs upstream ceph-common if no ceph repo present
Summary: [ceph-iscsi-ansible]: "ceph-iscsi-gw.yml" installs upstream ceph-common if no...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 2.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 2.2
Assignee: Aron Gunn
QA Contact: ceph-qe-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-10-17 13:33 UTC by Tejas
Modified: 2016-12-06 15:41 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-06 15:41:33 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 4 Paul Cuzner 2016-10-18 23:07:30 UTC
If I understand correctly, this is basically due to the gateway node not having the rhcs channel assigned to it. When you deployed the osd's the channels were there because of ceph-ansible - but for a dedicated gateway you didn't use downstream ceph ansible with a client role, or set up the channels manually on the gateway...is this right?

Comment 5 Tejas 2016-10-19 04:29:11 UTC
yes, on the gateway node the downstream ceph repos are not present. This is not applicable to upstream ceph.

Thanks,
Tejas

Comment 6 Paul Cuzner 2016-10-19 05:55:36 UTC
OK - so is this a documentation BZ? ie we need to ensure that the gateways are subscribed to the correct channels

Comment 7 Tejas 2016-10-19 07:31:14 UTC
I understand that there are no separate checks for downstream packages. So yes we need to ensure customers have the downstream repos enabled.

Comment 10 Tejas 2016-11-09 06:37:06 UTC
The warning looks good to me.

Moving to Verified


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.