Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
1. Proposed title of this feature request
Add task-group functionality to pulp-admin
2. Who is the customer behind the request?
Internal
3. What is the nature and description of the request?
pulp-admin can't handle task groups in pulp. However, getting information about them and ability to cancel them would be useful.
4. Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
1. Get progress information from current group tasks to monitor them from CLI
2. Cancel a group task if they are suspended in foreman and there is no opportunity to resume subtasks
5. How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional requirements here)
pulp-admin task-group cancel --task-group-id id
pulp-admin task-group progress --task-group-id id
6. For each functional requirement listed in question 5, specify how Red Hat
and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully implemented.
Output of commands from q5 is consistent with Pulp API output
https://docs.pulpproject.org/dev-guide/integration/rest-api/tasks.html#task-group-management
7. Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat bugzilla?
No
8. Does the customer have any specific timeline dependencies?
No
9. Is the sales team involved in this request and do they have any additional input?
No
10. List any affected packages or components.
pulp-admin-client-2.8.3.4-1.el7sat.noarch
11. Would the customer be able to assist in testing this functionality if implemented?
Be aware, that the pulp-admin tool is not officially supported for Satellite 6. Running commands with it that alter the pulp content can cause inconsistencies across the different services/databases (e.g. foreman/katello/pulp, postgres/mongo).
Comment 3pulp-infra@redhat.com
2016-11-21 18:50:35 UTC
The Pulp upstream bug status is at NEW. Updating the external tracker on this bug.
Comment 4pulp-infra@redhat.com
2016-11-21 18:50:38 UTC
The Pulp upstream bug priority is at Normal. Updating the external tracker on this bug.
Comment 5pulp-infra@redhat.com
2016-11-21 18:50:42 UTC
The Pulp upstream bug status is at NEW. Updating the external tracker on this bug.
Comment 6pulp-infra@redhat.com
2016-11-21 18:50:45 UTC
The Pulp upstream bug priority is at Normal. Updating the external tracker on this bug.
I totally understand that pulp-admin is not a part of Red Hat Satellite, however a lot of troubleshooting/maintenance tasks require usage of pulp-admin. I'm fine with closing this bug though and will track the upstream one.
Thanks! I'm closing with the "notabug" state since this does not apply to the product itself, but if anyone prefers a different "closed" state, feel free to adjust.