Hide Forgot
Description of problem: ======================= In TPS, Package verification is failing with below thing for the package redhat-release-server-7.3-8.el7rhgs #rpm -V redhat-release-server-7.3-8.el7rhgs.x86_64 doRpmCommand-result (256): .......T. c /etc/issue .......T. c /etc/issue.net S.5....T. c /etc/os-release result: verify test: FAIL: redhat-release-server.x86_64: /etc/issue.net .......T. c [tps:B] redhat-release-server.x86_64: /etc/os-release S.5....T. c [tps:B] redhat-release-server.x86_64: /etc/issue .......T. c [tps:B] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ============================================================= redhat-release-server-7.3-8.el7rhgs How reproducible: ================= Always Steps to Reproduce: =================== 1. Install redhat-release-server-7.3-8.el7rhgs 2. Verify the package using rpm -V redhat-release-server-7.3-8.el7rhgs 3. You will see above mentioned result Actual results: =============== Package verification is failing for the package redhat-release-server-7.3-8.el7rhgs Expected results: ================= Package verification should not throw any failures. Additional info:
Sreenath, Please address redhat-release-server package verification issues.
Isn't TPS installing redhat-release-server from Gluster over redhat-release-server from RHEL? I suppose that the supported use case is fresh installation from Gluster media and not installing the package on top of RHEL. The behavior might be expected due to following lines in spec file: %config /etc/os-release %config /etc/system-release-cpe %config(noreplace) /etc/issue %config(noreplace) /etc/issue.net
(In reply to Daniel Mach from comment #13) > Isn't TPS installing redhat-release-server from Gluster over > redhat-release-server from RHEL? Version of rhgs redhat-release-server is higher than the package present in the RHEL so during update/install of gluster we get the rhgs version of redhat-release-server, this is not a problem now. > I suppose that the supported use case is fresh installation from Gluster > media and not installing the package on top of RHEL. > > > The behavior might be expected due to following lines in spec file: > %config /etc/os-release > %config /etc/system-release-cpe > %config(noreplace) /etc/issue > %config(noreplace) /etc/issue.net If this behavior is expected then we can waive this in TPS as "EXPECTED"
Ok, closing as CANTFIX