Hide Forgot
This bug is to implement changes suggested in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380896. The suggestion to unify RHV-H and RHEL host content will be implemented in a separate bug. > 2. What is the actual difference between RHV-H and RHEL hosts? If we > recommend to install `screen` on rhevh, why cannot we install > `rhevm-appliance` as well? Is there an option to unify the two flows rather > then duplicating and missing the information? For instance, both flows at > the end recommend to upgrade RHEL hosts and reinstall RHEV-H. And the > language is not clear. > Also, I do not see where we specify recommendation to increase the size of > the HE storage on RHVH. > I vote to combine the two sections. > > 3. This note is not really clear. Maybe it is better to come at a later > location? > "During the upgrade procedure you will be asked to create a backup of the > Manager and copy it to the host machine where the upgrade is being > performed." > > 4. Storage requirements - should be more clear. > I would also include it in a box with "Important" title or something > similar. Otherwise the user may start the upgrade without having enough > space available and fail in the middle. I would recommend also to state > clearly, that we need twice more space that is used now, for the upgrade. > > 4.1. Imo this phrase is a bit out of context or can be rephrased somehow or > get more context. Not sure how to make it better: > "The upgrade procedure creates a backup disk on the self-hosted engine > storage domain. "
Moving back to default assignee to be triaged as resources allow.
Assigning to Tahlia for review. Tahlia, I think we've applied some of these changes in other bugs, but some may still need work. Adding Byron as QA contact so you can confer.
(In reply to Byron Gravenorst from comment #0) > This bug is to implement changes suggested in > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380896. > > The suggestion to unify RHV-H and RHEL host content will be implemented in a > separate bug. > > > 2. What is the actual difference between RHV-H and RHEL hosts? If we > > recommend to install `screen` on rhevh, why cannot we install > > `rhevm-appliance` as well? Is there an option to unify the two flows rather > > then duplicating and missing the information? For instance, both flows at > > the end recommend to upgrade RHEL hosts and reinstall RHEV-H. And the > > language is not clear. > > Also, I do not see where we specify recommendation to increase the size of > > the HE storage on RHVH. > > I vote to combine the two sections. Nacked in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390029#c1 The rest of the items still apply (for 4.0).
Hi Tahlia, Looks good to me. I don't remember at this point what was the initial complaint, but reading the current documentation makes sense. So let's publish it. Thank you!
Thanks Marina! Moving to docs QA. Preview is in comment 4, MR in comment 5.
Reviewed and merged.
Now published at https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.0/html/self-hosted_engine_guide/upgrading_the_self-hosted_engine and https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_virtualization/4.0/html/self-hosted_engine_guide/upgrading_a_rhev-h-based_self-hosted_engine_environment