Bug 1390912 - false positive in default credentials validation
Summary: false positive in default credentials validation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Providers
Version: 5.7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.8.0
Assignee: Sam Lucidi
QA Contact: Ola Pavlenko
URL:
Whiteboard: openstack
Depends On:
Blocks: 1428911
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-02 09:02 UTC by Ronnie Rasouli
Modified: 2018-02-12 16:26 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1428911 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-06-12 17:43:26 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: Openstack
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
evm log (2.88 MB, text/plain)
2016-11-02 09:02 UTC, Ronnie Rasouli 		no flags Details
evm and production log while validating the ssh key (50.23 KB, text/plain)
2016-11-02 09:04 UTC, Ronnie Rasouli 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Ronnie Rasouli 2016-11-02 09:02:50 UTC 
Created attachment 1216399 [details]
evm log

Description of problem:
The key is valid, however constantly after succesfull key validation it turns to invalid. 
validating again the key turn to be successful, user need to save the configuration again

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.7.0.9 beta 1

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. connect RHOS undercloud to CFME
2. add the undercloud private key to the infra provider configuration and save
3. wait ~10 minutes

Actual results:
The key is turn to be invalid quad icon show (!)

Expected results:
no key alerts for valid ones

Additional info:
Comment 2 Ronnie Rasouli 2016-11-02 09:04:12 UTC 
Created attachment 1216400 [details]
evm and production log while validating the ssh key
Comment 3 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2016-11-08 15:40:30 UTC 
This is actually a false negative, correct?  If so, we can check to see if it's a similar issue as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390643
Comment 4 Dave Johnson 2016-12-06 19:43:27 UTC 
Loic, please weigh in on this one in terms of priority and where this should be fixed.
Comment 9 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2017-02-21 15:37:27 UTC 
This should be fixed as part of another PR
Comment 10 Tzu-Mainn Chen 2017-03-03 15:01:41 UTC 
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/13445 is the PR which fixes this.
Comment 12 Ronnie Rasouli 2017-03-08 07:27:31 UTC 
verified on 5.8.0.3
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.