Bug 1394228 - Clarify NFV / HA Solution Description
Summary: Clarify NFV / HA Solution Description
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: documentation
Version: 9.0 (Mitaka)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: RHOS Documentation Team
QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-11 12:49 UTC by Marko Myllynen
Modified: 2018-07-25 14:58 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-07-25 14:58:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Marko Myllynen 2016-11-11 12:49:07 UTC 
Description of problem:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-openstack-platform/9/single/red-hat-solution-for-network-functions-virtualization/ describes Red Hat Solution for NFV. Section 2.4. High Availability provides a brief introduction to HA and then 2.4.1. High Availability (keepalived) describes HA in a bit more detail from keepalived POV. 2.4.2. Instance High Availability (pacemaker remote) discusses Instance HA.

This makes it look like keepalived is the corner stone of OpenStack / NFV HA. But as we know that's not the whole story, for example, some components are HA without keepalived.

Please clarify the HA description in the RH NFV document to match what recent RH OSP are actually using for HA.
Comment 1 Christophe Fontaine 2018-07-25 14:58:29 UTC 
The current documentation (OSP13) should cover the requirements.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.