Bug 1395750 - RFE - Explore whether an option for automating the affinity mask
Summary: RFE - Explore whether an option for automating the affinity mask
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: rt-tests
Version: 7.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: John Kacur
QA Contact: Jiri Kastner
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1353018
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-16 15:17 UTC by John Kacur
Modified: 2017-03-28 13:18 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-28 13:18:10 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description John Kacur 2016-11-16 15:17:40 UTC
Currently, if you use the -t option without an argument cyclictest presumes that it should put a measurement thread on every online cpu. This is the original logic, which is to test the entire system.
The alternative is to use -t<n> and -a<cpulist> to create <n> measurement threads and affine them to <cpulist>. One complaint I have about this is that no matter where you place the measurement threads, they're labeled 0-(n-1) in the output, so it makes it hard to map a test thread back to the cpu where it ran. Wondering if we can update the output to show the core to which a test thread is bound.

I'm also wondering if we can add a third option to say "just use the cores in your current cpu affinity mask". That way you can rejigger the tuning parameters for a system and then just kick off cyclictest without having to figure out how your -a/-t options should change to match.

I'm thinking where we've diddled the isolcpus= boot parameter and want to try cyclictest over there like this:
        # presumes isolcpus=0,12
        taskset --cpus=0,12 cyclictest -p95 -mn --affinity-mask

So that we'd get two measurment threads, affine to cpus 0 and 12. I realize that we could do this with '-t2 -a0,12' but I was hoping to simplify things.

Comment 1 John Kacur 2017-03-28 13:18:10 UTC
This feature item should be moved to the rewrite of cyclictest we are planning


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.