Hide Forgot
Description of problem: Improve Satellite6 documentation by giving an option to the user to see instructions only for rhel 6/rhel7/both Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Satellite 6.2 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-satellite/6.2/paged/installation-guide/chapter-6-upgrading-satellite-server-and-capsule-server Actual results: Although this comment is applicable to entire Satellite 6 documentation, for easy example, look at this section: - Section 6.2 - Step 12: "12. Enable the new repository for Red Hat Satellite 6.2. On Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, run the following command: # subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-6-server-satellite-6.2-rpms On Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, run the following command: # subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-7-server-satellite-6.2-rpms" Expected results: If I am a customer who have just rhel 7 installations, I should be shown: "12. Enable the new repository for Red Hat Satellite 6.2. On Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7, run the following command: # subscription-manager repos --enable rhel-7-server-satellite-6.2-rpms" Additional info: The user should be given an option to select his base OS - say 'rhel6' or 'rhel7' or 'both' in a dropdown - something like https://theforeman.org/plugins/#2.2Packageinstallation Advantages: * The user will be shown only the things which are relevant to his base OS. This will improve readability and hence improve speed of installations. Document URL: Section Number and Name: Describe the issue: Suggestions for improvement: Additional information:
Hi Sureshkumar, Thank you for raising this bug. This has been open for a while now, and I apologize for the long delay in providing an update. I have now discussed this with our tooling team, and I am afraid this is not something we are able to implement at this stage. As such, I will now be closing this bug, but we are continuing to look into ways we can improve the customer experience with the documentation, and we might be able to find a way to split out instructions this way some time in the future. I will let you know if we are able to make any advances at some stage. Kind regards, Andrew