Bug 1396354 - negative case: lookup using ls is not detecting a file created from backend(unlike fuse mount)
Summary: negative case: lookup using ls is not detecting a file created from backend(u...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gluster-nfs
Version: rhgs-3.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Jiffin
QA Contact: Manisha Saini
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-18 07:10 UTC by Nag Pavan Chilakam
Modified: 2018-11-19 04:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-11-19 04:07:03 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nag Pavan Chilakam 2016-11-18 07:10:55 UTC
on a distribute volume,
when i create a file f1 on the backend brick(the correct brick which it hashes to)
 and then from gnfs client do a ls, it doenst display the file
however when we do a "ls f1" then it is listed
However in fuse client, a general ls does display the file

[root@dhcp35-37 ~]# rpm -qa|grep gluster
gluster-nagios-common-0.2.4-1.el7rhgs.noarch
glusterfs-server-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-ganesha-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-api-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-libs-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-client-xlators-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
nfs-ganesha-gluster-2.3.1-8.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-cli-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
python-gluster-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.noarch
glusterfs-devel-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-events-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-geo-replication-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-fuse-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-api-devel-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-rdma-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64
gluster-nagios-addons-0.2.7-1.el7rhgs.x86_64
glusterfs-3.8.4-3.el7rhgs.x86_64

Comment 2 Nag Pavan Chilakam 2016-11-18 07:17:44 UTC
hit this bug as part of validation of 1328451 - observing " Too many levels of symbolic links" after adding bricks and then issuing a replace brick


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.