Bug 1396396 - In installation document its not specified to create flavor as per the configuration
Summary: In installation document its not specified to create flavor as per the config...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: documentation
Version: 10.0 (Newton)
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: RHOS Documentation Team
QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1382278 1408994
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-18 09:11 UTC by Pratik Pravin Bandarkar
Modified: 2016-12-28 19:27 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-08 14:03:00 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Pratik Pravin Bandarkar 2016-11-18 09:11:04 UTC
Description of problem:

In installation document its not specified to create flavor as per the configuration[1]

[1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-openstack-platform/10-beta/single/director-installation-and-usage/#sect-Tagging_Nodes_into_Profiles

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHOS10

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
In installation document its not specified to create flavor as per the configuration.

Expected results:
Need to create flavors as per hardware configuration. 

Additional info:

Comment 1 Dan Macpherson 2016-12-08 05:16:00 UTC
@Pratik, manually creating flavors shouldn't be necessary since the Undercloud installation script takes care of this.

First it deletes the default flavors ('m1.tiny', 'm1.small', 'm1.medium', etc) [1], then it creates the director specific default flavors ('control', 'compute', 'ceph-storage', etc)[2].

Also Dave Cain linked to BZ#1382278 which shows the default flavors from [1] have been removed. This more so affects the Overcloud.

Probably the only situation needed for manually creating is for composable roles, but I've already got a BZ for that: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398638

If there's no objections, I'm going to close this BZ as WONTFIX. But just wanted to NEEDINFO you just in case there was anything you needed to add.

[1] https://github.com/openstack/instack-undercloud/blob/master/instack_undercloud/undercloud.py#L1023

[2] https://github.com/openstack/instack-undercloud/blob/master/instack_undercloud/undercloud.py#L1140

Comment 2 Pratik Pravin Bandarkar 2016-12-08 08:40:55 UTC
(In reply to Dan Macpherson from comment #1)
> @Pratik, manually creating flavors shouldn't be necessary since the
> Undercloud installation script takes care of this.
> 
> First it deletes the default flavors ('m1.tiny', 'm1.small', 'm1.medium',
> etc) [1], then it creates the director specific default flavors ('control',
> 'compute', 'ceph-storage', etc)[2].
> 
> Also Dave Cain linked to BZ#1382278 which shows the default flavors from [1]
> have been removed. This more so affects the Overcloud.
> 
> Probably the only situation needed for manually creating is for composable
> roles, but I've already got a BZ for that:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398638
> 
> If there's no objections, I'm going to close this BZ as WONTFIX. But just
> wanted to NEEDINFO you just in case there was anything you needed to add.
> 
> [1]
> https://github.com/openstack/instack-undercloud/blob/master/
> instack_undercloud/undercloud.py#L1023
> 
> [2]
> https://github.com/openstack/instack-undercloud/blob/master/
> instack_undercloud/undercloud.py#L1140

Thanks for clarification. We can close this bz.

Comment 3 Dan Macpherson 2016-12-08 14:03:00 UTC
No prob. Thanks, Pratik


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.