Hide Forgot
Description of problem: using eg. two zones one would expect that when zones/interfaces forward between each other, ports only on the target(wanting to access) zone would be relevant, their state of open/close and not on the zone/interfaces which forwards, right? One would expect this would work out-of-box and without use of -direct rules. Am I correct? Can this be fixed? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
This has been proposed for firewalld version 0.5.
Hi lejeczek, Could you provide some details? The Summary and Description don't make it very clear. Configuration, CLI output, etc are helpful.
Will do, but not earlier than in three weeks time - away on holidays - sorry.
ok