Bug 1399591 - "Ignore if not exists" to be displayed in Rule Details
Summary: "Ignore if not exists" to be displayed in Rule Details
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Bugzilla
Classification: Community
Component: Internal Tools
Version: 4.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified vote
Target Milestone: 4.4
Assignee: Matt Tyson 🤬
QA Contact: tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-29 10:57 UTC by Romana Cadova
Modified: 2018-12-09 06:29 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-30 01:00:49 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Romana Cadova 2016-11-29 10:57:41 UTC
When creating/editing a rule in BRE, in step 3 there is a possibility to check "ignore if not exists" field.

However, when displaying the Rule Details, this is not visible.

Would it be possible to display also this field in Rule Details too?

Example here:
https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=ruleengine/details/index.html&rule_name=unapprove

Thank you!

Comment 1 Rony Gong 🔥 2016-12-20 09:28:16 UTC
Tested on QA environment(5.0.3-rh19)
Result: Pass
Steps:
1.It show as:
Change the 'rhel-7.1.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.2.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.0.z' flag to '?' if it is currently '+'
Change the 'rhel-rawhide' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.0.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'exception' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'blocker' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'fast' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)

Comment 2 Rony Gong 🔥 2017-01-09 09:51:35 UTC
Tested on QA environment(4.4.12065-1.el6)
Result: Pass
Steps:
1.It show as:
Change the 'rhel-7.1.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.2.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.0.z' flag to '?' if it is currently '+'
Change the 'rhel-rawhide' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'rhel-7.0.0' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'exception' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'blocker' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)
Change the 'fast' flag to '?' if it is currently '+' (ignored if not present)

Comment 3 Matt Tyson 🤬 2017-01-30 01:00:49 UTC
This change is now live. If there are any issues, do not reopen this bug.                                                                                                           
Instead, you should create a new bug and reference this bug.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.