Bug 1400239 - sendmail fail to build with openssl 1.1
Summary: sendmail fail to build with openssl 1.1
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: sendmail
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Škarvada
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1112340
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-30 17:41 UTC by Ondřej Lysoněk
Modified: 2016-12-19 14:12 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-09 16:00:44 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)
openssl 1.1 compatibility (4.54 KB, patch)
2016-12-01 16:54 UTC, Patrick Monnerat 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Ondřej Lysoněk 2016-11-30 17:41:55 UTC 
Description of problem:
Sendmail fails to build with openssl 1.1, which is now available in Rawhide.
Comment 1 Patrick Monnerat 2016-12-01 16:54:17 UTC 
Created attachment 1226889 [details]
openssl 1.1 compatibility

This patch makes sendmail 8.15.2 compilable with openssl 1.1.
However it needs more functional testing than I did.
Needs review.
Points to test are RSA, DSA, Diffie-Hellman.
I hope it helps :-)
Comment 2 Jaroslav Škarvada 2016-12-01 17:34:15 UTC 
(In reply to Patrick Monnerat from comment #1)
> Created attachment 1226889 [details]
> openssl 1.1 compatibility
> 
> This patch makes sendmail 8.15.2 compilable with openssl 1.1.
> However it needs more functional testing than I did.
> Needs review.
> Points to test are RSA, DSA, Diffie-Hellman.
> I hope it helps :-)

Thanks for the patch, please send it upstream to get the credit in release info.
Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2016-12-09 15:48:40 UTC 
Patch looks sane, I will push it into rawhide untill upstream delivers official solution.
Comment 4 Patrick Monnerat 2016-12-19 14:12:29 UTC 
> Thanks for the patch, please send it upstream to get the credit in release info.

No I wont, I'm afraid. I already sent them two patches: they never considered them and rejected them because they chase "code bloat" :-(

Please do what you want with this patch: I don't even claim credits for it.

Thanks for having applied it in the meantime.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.