Bug 1402022 - bodhi mails and subject lines -> strip them to a sane lenght
Summary: bodhi mails and subject lines -> strip them to a sane lenght
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1366325
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: bodhi
Version: 24
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Luke Macken
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-12-06 15:19 UTC by Harald Reindl
Modified: 2017-04-09 15:36 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-06 18:43:40 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
it's ridiculous (103.35 KB, image/png)
2016-12-06 15:19 UTC, Harald Reindl
no flags Details
insane (169.62 KB, image/png)
2017-04-08 16:12 UTC, Harald Reindl
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github fedora-infra bodhi issues 882 0 None None None 2016-12-06 18:43:39 UTC

Description Harald Reindl 2016-12-06 15:19:20 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 1 Randy Barlow 2016-12-06 18:43:40 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1366325 ***

Comment 2 Harald Reindl 2016-12-06 18:59:27 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 3 Randy Barlow 2016-12-06 23:36:10 UTC
Hello Harald!

Perhaps I misunderstand the meanings of the resolution states, but I intended for Closed --> Upstream to mean that I will track the issue with the upstream issue tracker rather than here on Bugzilla. In this case, that would be the GitHub issue that I marked as the "External Bug ID":

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/882

I generally prefer to use BZ to track packaging related issues for Bodhi (including existing patches from upstream that need to be backported as spec file patches), and I use GitHub to track issues with the code itself. I don't mind at all when people file issues here since bug reporting is a valuable contribution - I usually just refile them at GitHub and mark them Closed --> Upstream and mark the external bug id.

I hope that helps, and let me know if you have a suggestion about how I could use Bugzilla to make that clearer in the future.

Comment 4 Harald Reindl 2016-12-07 07:51:51 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 5 Randy Barlow 2016-12-08 19:53:54 UTC
Hi Harald,

I've actually just today written a patch to stop it from writing the "This update has reached the stable karma threshold and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes" e-mails repeatedly!

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1145

We just need to get that reviewed, merged, released, and deployed. There are a few other fixes I need to release as well, so it might take a few more days.

Comment 6 Harald Reindl 2016-12-08 19:55:53 UTC
thank you!

Comment 7 Harald Reindl 2017-04-08 16:10:08 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 8 Harald Reindl 2017-04-08 16:12:37 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)
Comment 9 Randy Barlow 2017-04-09 15:10:18 UTC
Nobody works full time on Bodhi, and there are quite a few high priority items that take the little bit of time that is spent on Bodhi.

Pull requests are welcome!

Comment 10 Harald Reindl 2017-04-09 15:36:55 UTC Comment hidden (abuse)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.