Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
For non-admin users, 2 permissions are needed to be able to promote a content view to an environment (promote_or_remove_content_views and promote_or_remove_content_views_to_environment). Filter on the first one creates a restriction on what content views a user is allowed to promote, the second one restricts what environments a user is allowed to promote to. The idea is that some users may be allowed to promote certain content views to 'Test' environment, but not to 'Production', which allows for better granularity. One negative side effect is that both permissions need to be assigned to allow promotions. Not all users are aware of it and [1] was raised. Maybe we could add a side note on this to Content Management Guide (or some other place if it is more appropriate).
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317806