Bug 145053 - CAN-2005-0064 xpdf buffer overflow
CAN-2005-0064 xpdf buffer overflow
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gpdf (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Marco Pesenti Gritti
: Security
Depends On:
Blocks: 142822
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-01-13 17:45 EST by Josh Bressers
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-02-16 08:21:15 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Josh Bressers 2005-01-13 17:45:31 EST
*** This bug has been split off bug 145049 ***

------- Original comment by Josh Bressers (Security Response Team) on 2005.01.13
17:30 -------

iDEFENSE has reported a stack based buffer overflow in xpdf.

The patch is here:

The iDEFENSE advisory is attachment 109745 [details]
Comment 1 Josh Bressers 2005-01-13 17:47:35 EST

We're going to need some new packages rolled for RHSA-2005:027 to fix this new
issue.  Please respect the embargo when working with CVS.
Comment 2 Josh Bressers 2005-01-14 07:16:54 EST
The patch URL does not yet work.  We don't have a patch from upstream yet.  I'll
update the bugs as soon as I know.
Comment 3 Mark J. Cox (Product Security) 2005-01-19 05:22:27 EST
Now public, see URL for patch, removing embargo
Comment 4 Dan Williams 2005-01-19 11:53:07 EST
Marco, you want to take this one?  If not I'll do it.
Comment 5 Marco Pesenti Gritti 2005-01-19 11:55:40 EST
Dan, I'm working on it. I built the package and I'm finishing to file the
errata. I'm a bit slow because it's my first errata... hopefully I'm doing
things right ;)
Comment 6 Marco Pesenti Gritti 2005-01-19 14:49:11 EST
I *think* everything is done here. Please let me know if there are problems,
it's my first errata, I tried to be careful but... it's not the simpler process
in the world ;)
Comment 7 Josh Bressers 2005-01-19 15:04:12 EST

The things look fine, thanks.  I'm moving the bug to modified.
Comment 8 Jay Turner 2005-02-16 08:21:15 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.