Bug 145070 - pam_timestamp_check and utmp: pam_t, initrc_var_run_t
Summary: pam_timestamp_check and utmp: pam_t, initrc_var_run_t
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: selinux-policy-strict   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Daniel Walsh
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-01-14 02:06 UTC by Ivan Gyurdiev
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-01-20 18:24:09 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ivan Gyurdiev 2005-01-14 02:06:05 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5)
Gecko/20041228 Firefox/1.0 Fedora/1.0-8

Description of problem:
audit(1105668065.887:0): avc:  denied  { read write } for  pid=3803
exe=/sbin/pam_timestamp_check name=utmp dev=dm-0 ino=1168133
scontext=user_u:user_r:pam_t
tcontext=system_u:object_r:initrc_var_run_t tclass=file

audit(1105668065.887:0): avc:  denied  { lock } for  pid=3803
exe=/sbin/pam_timestamp_check path=/var/run/utmp dev=dm-0 ino=1168133
scontext=user_u:user_r:pam_t
tcontext=system_u:object_r:initrc_var_run_t tclass=file



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-strict-1.21.1-1

How reproducible:
Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
    

Additional info:

Comment 1 Daniel Walsh 2005-01-18 22:14:37 UTC
Were you running in permissive mode?

Dan

Comment 2 Ivan Gyurdiev 2005-01-18 22:15:53 UTC
Yes. Will retest in enforcing I suppose.


Comment 3 Ivan Gyurdiev 2005-01-20 18:24:09 UTC
Closing...will reopen if I see this again
With the execmod changes that I did to various policies
I can finally run X in enforcing mode. I see surprisingly little
denials - very good..




Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.