Bug 1459062 - [DOC] Document hostgroup-based provisioning
Summary: [DOC] Document hostgroup-based provisioning
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.3.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Melanie Corr
QA Contact: satellite-doc-list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-06-06 08:16 UTC by Lukas Zapletal
Modified: 2020-01-07 14:53 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-10-25 09:14:48 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lukas Zapletal 2017-06-06 08:16:33 UTC
Foreman has a feature called Hostgroup-based rendering

http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/foreman/wiki/templatewriting#Hostgroup-based-rendering

This is not widely used by our community but Satellite customers often seek this feature because of how provisioning worked in Satellite 5. Rough workflow is:

1) Associate host group with an operating system, installation media and architecture in Templates page.
2) Render Default PXE Template using the button
3) PXE boot an unknown host on PXE/DHCP managed network.
4) Menu shows up, hostgroup should appear, install a system with it.

See discussion at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459061

Comment 1 Andrew Dahms 2017-06-08 02:09:49 UTC
Hi Lukas,

Thank you for raising this bug.

We have not documented this feature up until now because it has been considered unsupported.

A 'Note' box was added to the Provisioning Guide when this was brought up in BZ#1380150 to help clarify this to customers -

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.2/html-single/provisioning_guide/#Provisioning_Bare_Metal_Hosts

Based on the engineering bug, it looks like we might be looking to change the status of this feature to supported. Is that correct?

Also raising a needinfo for kdixon - Kathryn, are you aware of any discussions about the supportability of this feature, or would there be any issues with documenting it and removing the 'Note' box above?

We understand this is a popular request from customers, and we would be more than happy to document it. I am just trying to be careful to make sure we provide the correct guidance. :)

Kind regards,

Andrew

Comment 2 Lukas Zapletal 2017-06-08 12:05:46 UTC
Hello,

I recorded a video that shows the workflow for Satellite 6.3. I hope that gives you enough information how to test and document this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc5DN_Xov40&feature=youtu.be

Comment 5 Karie 2019-09-26 15:39:19 UTC
Hi Lukas

Has there been any movement on the easier way to do this? Should this bug remain open? This bug is for version 6.3 which EOL in the spring. 

Thanks 
Karie

Comment 6 Lukas Zapletal 2019-09-27 08:43:05 UTC
Karie,

I recorded a video which is valid for all Satellite versions including 6.6. I expected the docs team to take from there.

Comment 8 Melanie Corr 2019-09-30 13:50:29 UTC
Think this is my fault. I assigned it to myself but it does not show up in my Bugzilla query I use to prioritise my work. I should be able to do this with what has been provided. 
I apologise for the inconvenience. I think this got lost somehow. 
Thanks for the prodding.

Comment 11 Melanie Corr 2019-10-25 09:14:48 UTC
After talking to Lukas a few weeks ago, we were unable to determine is this scenario supported and whether it will be relevant in the near future. 

For these reasons, I am closing this bug but please feel free to open if it is deemed important.

Thanks,

Melanie


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.