Bug 1471779 - Josm complains when trying to get data from the db
Josm complains when trying to get data from the db
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: josm (Show other bugs)
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Cédric OLIVIER
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On: 1499456 1562174
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2017-07-17 08:28 EDT by Ludovic Hirlimann
Modified: 2018-05-29 07:40 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2018-05-29 07:40:59 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Ludovic Hirlimann 2017-07-17 08:28:48 EDT
Trying to get data from labastide murat, I get a noice dialog sayoing I need to update.

I also get the following stack trace:
2017-07-17 14:23:42.218 INFO: GET https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/TestedVersion?format=txt -> 200
2017-07-17 14:23:52.980 INFO: Opening URL: https://josm.openstreetmap.de
2017-07-17 14:24:10.641 SEVERE: Handled by bug report queue: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.openstreetmap.josm.plugins.utilsplugin2.actions.CopyTagsAction.getCurrentDataSet()Lorg/openstreetmap/josm/data/osm/DataSet;
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.openstreetmap.josm.plugins.utilsplugin2.actions.CopyTagsAction.getCurrentDataSet()Lorg/openstreetmap/josm/data/osm/DataSet;
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.plugins.utilsplugin2.actions.CopyTagsAction.updateEnabledState(CopyTagsAction.java:69)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.actions.JosmAction$LayerChangeAdapter.layerRemoving(JosmAction.java:348)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.layer.LayerManager.fireLayerRemoving(LayerManager.java:422)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.layer.LayerManager.realRemoveSingleLayer(LayerManager.java:235)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.layer.MainLayerManager.realRemoveSingleLayer(MainLayerManager.java:266)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.layer.LayerManager.realRemoveLayer(LayerManager.java:228)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.layer.LayerManager.lambda$removeLayer$1(LayerManager.java:214)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.util.GuiHelper.runInEDTAndWaitWithException(GuiHelper.java:138)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.layer.LayerManager.removeLayer(LayerManager.java:214)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.layer.LayerManager.realResetState(LayerManager.java:455)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.layer.MainLayerManager.realResetState(MainLayerManager.java:376)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.util.GuiHelper.runInEDTAndWaitWithException(GuiHelper.java:138)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.layer.LayerManager.resetState(LayerManager.java:449)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.Main.shutdown(Main.java:879)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.MainApplication.shutdown(MainApplication.java:120)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.Main.exitJosm(Main.java:858)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.MainFrame$ExitWindowAdapter.windowClosing(MainFrame.java:162)
	at java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.windowClosing(AWTEventMulticaster.java:349)
	at java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.windowClosing(AWTEventMulticaster.java:349)
	at java.awt.Window.processWindowEvent(Window.java:2054)
	at javax.swing.JFrame.processWindowEvent(JFrame.java:305)
	at java.awt.Window.processEvent(Window.java:2013)
	at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4889)
	at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2294)
	at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:2746)
	at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4711)
	at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:758)
	at java.awt.EventQueue.access$500(EventQueue.java:97)
	at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:709)
	at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:703)
	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
	at java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:80)
	at java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:90)
	at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:731)
	at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:729)
	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
	at java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:80)
	at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:728)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:201)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:116)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:105)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:101)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:93)
	at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:82)

2017-07-17 14:24:11.055 INFO: GET https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/TestedVersion?format=txt -> 200

Current version is 12450 can we get an update ?
Comment 1 Ludovic Hirlimann 2017-09-25 04:26:33 EDT
Cédric anything I can do to help you push a new version ?
Comment 2 Cédric OLIVIER 2017-10-07 11:30:25 EDT
Sorry I haven't got enough time actually.

Josm needs a new version of apache-commons-jcs (2.2 - actually 2.0) 
And apache-commons-jcs needs geronimo-annotation-1.2 (actually 1.0)
Comment 3 Fedora End Of Life 2018-05-03 03:54:42 EDT
This message is a reminder that Fedora 26 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 26. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '26'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 26 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.
Comment 4 Fedora End Of Life 2018-05-29 07:40:59 EDT
Fedora 26 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2018-05-29. Fedora 26
is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any
further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.