Description of problem: In several components (Fedora Core, Fedora extras, ...) the arch ia32e is shown. This is not needed and confusing as there is little difference between x86_64 and ia32e; this makes bugzilla usage hard and confusing without a reason. So IMHO the ia32e should only shown in the chooser for RHEL (maybe only RHEL3?) where it is needed: Quoting: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-February/msg00300.html from Arjan van de Ven: >> While at it and just out of curiosity -- why to we have both ia32e and >> x86_64 as possible archs in bugzilla.redhat.com? >because for RHEL3 we had to do a second kernel rpm because we couldn't >retrofit em64t support into the kernel within the compability and stability >contraints rhel3 updates have. >> I'm just wondering if that is (still?) needed... >not for anything not RHEL3.
Unfortunately the arch list is global to all products and cannot be manipulated depending on which product you are submitting against. This is a design flaw of Bugzilla and will be best tackled by the upstream Bugzilla community.