Bug 149348 - gij fails due to non-executable memory issue
gij fails due to non-executable memory issue
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gcc34 (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jakub Jelinek
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-02-22 12:13 EST by Andrew Overholt
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 3.4.3-20
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-02-23 09:42:42 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Andrew Overholt 2005-02-22 12:13:05 EST
Description of problem:
Just as with gcc head, gij fails as in:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Input HelloWorld like so:
public class HelloWorld {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        System.out.println("Hello, world.");
2. gcj -C HelloWorld.java
3. gij HelloWorld
Actual results:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
   at gnu.gcj.runtime.FirstThread.call_main() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.5.0.0)
   at gnu.gcj.runtime.FirstThread.run() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.5.0.0)
   at _Jv_ThreadRun(java.lang.Thread) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.5.0.0)
   at _Jv_RunMain(java.lang.Class, byte const, int, byte const,
boolean) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.5.0.0)
   at __libc_start_main (/lib/tls/libc-2.3.4.so)

Expected results:
Hello, world.

Additional info:
I believe Bryce McKinlay is working on back-porting the gcc head fix
to the gcc34 branch.
Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2005-02-22 12:14:43 EST
I have it backported, just haven't built the packages yet.
Comment 2 Andrew Overholt 2005-02-22 12:21:07 EST
Cool.  I'd like to build a new version of gjdoc (an actual released non-beta
version this time) and that depends upon this.  It's not a huge deal, though.

BTW, will you apply your backported fix to upstream as well?
Comment 3 Bryce McKinlay 2005-02-22 20:06:19 EST
FYI I have checked in the patch to the upstream gcc 3.4-branch
Comment 4 Jakub Jelinek 2005-02-23 09:42:42 EST
Should be fixed in gcc-3.4.3-20.
Comment 5 Tim Powers 2005-06-09 06:57:41 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.