Bug 149778 - Package dependency problem: grisbi <--> libofx
Summary: Package dependency problem: grisbi <--> libofx
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: grisbi   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 3
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Aurelien Bompard
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
: 150032 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2005-02-26 15:33 UTC by Sven Wahl
Modified: 2014-01-21 22:51 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-03-24 12:09:02 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sven Wahl 2005-02-26 15:33:34 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050224 Firefox/1.0.1 Fedora/1.0.1-1.3.1

Description of problem:
Red Hat published an update for the LibOFX library in FC3 the other day,
which brings libofx from version 0.6.6 to version 0.7.0.

Having grisbi from Fedora Extras installed, I stumbled across a package
dependency problem when trying to update libofx:
grisbi-0.5.5-1 requires libofx.so.0, which is provided by libofx-0.6.6,
but the updated libofx with version 0.7.0 provides libofx.so.1 instead.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Attempting to update libofx-0.6.6 to version 0.7.0  

Actual Results:  Unresolvable chain of dependencies:
grisbi  0.5.5-1                          requires libofx.so.0

Additional info:

Comment 1 Seth Vidal 2005-02-26 16:50:06 UTC
does this need anything more than a rebuild?

Comment 2 Aurelien Bompard 2005-02-26 17:00:15 UTC
No, a simple rebuild is enough. I was waiting for the anwer about epochs to
commit my update. Now it's done. I'll update the wiki.

Comment 3 Sven Wahl 2005-03-01 08:55:18 UTC
Thanks for rebuilding grisbi! But -- I'm sorry to say it -- the package
dependency conflict described in this bug persists. The new grisbi-0.5.5-2
package still requires libofx.so.0.

Comment 4 Michael Schwendt 2005-03-01 12:34:38 UTC
Then increase the libofx-devel build requirement to >= 0.7.0 to make sure the
right soname is built against.

Comment 5 Michael Schwendt 2005-03-01 20:46:30 UTC
*** Bug 150032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Sven Wahl 2005-03-21 21:13:12 UTC
Could someone with CVS access please follow up this bug (i.e. increase the
libofx-devel build requirement in the grisbi specfile to >= 0.7.0 -- as Michael
suggested --  and request a rebuilt).


Comment 7 Aurelien Bompard 2005-03-21 21:18:34 UTC
Yes sorry, I'll do that now.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.