Bug 149778 - Package dependency problem: grisbi <--> libofx
Package dependency problem: grisbi <--> libofx
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: grisbi (Show other bugs)
3
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Aurelien Bompard
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
: 150032 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-02-26 10:33 EST by Sven Wahl
Modified: 2014-01-21 17:51 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-03-24 07:09:02 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Sven Wahl 2005-02-26 10:33:34 EST
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050224 Firefox/1.0.1 Fedora/1.0.1-1.3.1

Description of problem:
Red Hat published an update for the LibOFX library in FC3 the other day,
which brings libofx from version 0.6.6 to version 0.7.0.

Having grisbi from Fedora Extras installed, I stumbled across a package
dependency problem when trying to update libofx:
grisbi-0.5.5-1 requires libofx.so.0, which is provided by libofx-0.6.6,
but the updated libofx with version 0.7.0 provides libofx.so.1 instead.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
grisbi-0.5.5-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Attempting to update libofx-0.6.6 to version 0.7.0  

Actual Results:  Unresolvable chain of dependencies:
grisbi  0.5.5-1                          requires libofx.so.0

Additional info:
Comment 1 Seth Vidal 2005-02-26 11:50:06 EST
does this need anything more than a rebuild?
Comment 2 Aurelien Bompard 2005-02-26 12:00:15 EST
No, a simple rebuild is enough. I was waiting for the anwer about epochs to
commit my update. Now it's done. I'll update the wiki.
Comment 3 Sven Wahl 2005-03-01 03:55:18 EST
Thanks for rebuilding grisbi! But -- I'm sorry to say it -- the package
dependency conflict described in this bug persists. The new grisbi-0.5.5-2
package still requires libofx.so.0.
Comment 4 Michael Schwendt 2005-03-01 07:34:38 EST
Then increase the libofx-devel build requirement to >= 0.7.0 to make sure the
right soname is built against.
Comment 5 Michael Schwendt 2005-03-01 15:46:30 EST
*** Bug 150032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Sven Wahl 2005-03-21 16:13:12 EST
Could someone with CVS access please follow up this bug (i.e. increase the
libofx-devel build requirement in the grisbi specfile to >= 0.7.0 -- as Michael
suggested --  and request a rebuilt).

Thanks!
Comment 7 Aurelien Bompard 2005-03-21 16:18:34 EST
Yes sorry, I'll do that now.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.