RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1509049 - [RFE] Anaconda installclasses should support filtering the available bonding types
Summary: [RFE] Anaconda installclasses should support filtering the available bonding ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: anaconda
Version: 8.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.2
Assignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team
QA Contact: Release Test Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1790869
Blocks: 1447028
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-11-02 19:33 UTC by Ryan Barry
Modified: 2023-09-15 00:04 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-01-08 07:25:00 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ryan Barry 2017-11-02 19:33:23 UTC 
Description of problem:
vdsm (for RHV) does not support bonding mode 0, but we do not have an effective way to block users from selecting this during installation.

It would be ideal for Anaconda installclasses to support blacklisting (or whitelisting) available network types.
Comment 2 Radek Vykydal 2017-11-03 09:58:43 UTC 
Regarding configuration via boot options or kickstart - this is nearly impossible using installclasses as they are applied only in stage2 while in common cases network configuration is created and applied (boot options) or prepared for stage 2 NM (kickstart) in stage1/initramfs.

As for GUI - we are using NetworkManager Connection Editor for configuration. We could exclude configuring Bond devices in general, but for finer granularity (mode 0) we'd need to have support for this in nm-c-e.
Comment 3 Sandro Bonazzola 2018-10-10 15:25:18 UTC 
RHV-H 4.3 RFE at bug #1447028 depend on this.
Can you please give a target release for this RFE to be implemented so we can schedule the RHV-H feature accordingly?
If it's not going to be in 7.6 or 7.6.1 we'll probably need to re-target the RHV-H RFE.
Comment 4 Jiri Konecny 2018-10-11 08:33:33 UTC 
This issue won't be implemented in 7.6 but we will look on this in 7.7 planning.
Comment 5 Sandro Bonazzola 2018-11-28 10:43:30 UTC 
(In reply to Jiri Konecny from comment #4)
> This issue won't be implemented in 7.6 but we will look on this in 7.7
> planning.

Moved RHV-H RFE at bug #1447028 to RHV 4.4 accordingly
Comment 6 Sandro Bonazzola 2019-06-12 08:19:48 UTC 
Moved to RHEL 8.1 since RHV 4.4 will be based on that. Can you please confirm this will make RHEL 8.1?
Comment 7 Sandro Bonazzola 2019-11-20 11:11:31 UTC 
8.1 shipped, proposing for 8.2
Comment 8 Radek Vykydal 2020-02-03 12:42:28 UTC 
There has been a BZ opened (bug 1790869) to allow the feature delivery for GUI, but before starting to work on it (ie adding support to NM) we should ask if the feature would make sense being available only for GUI configuration for RHV, because as stated in comment #2 the support for boot options would be almost impossible, the support for kickstart would require substantial changes in anaconda networking code (handling all kickstart network configuration post switch-root) that might be happening in the future but it is not yet clear how close this future is, my estimate would be RHEL9 at earliest.
Comment 9 Radek Vykydal 2020-04-08 08:01:31 UTC 
Still no reply to comment #8 from Ryan, adding needinfo on Sandro.
Comment 10 Ryan Barry 2020-04-08 10:14:31 UTC 
Radek, I suppose I didn't see a question there. But if it can't be kickstarted, close WONTFIX
Comment 11 Sandro Bonazzola 2020-04-14 12:33:54 UTC 
(In reply to Radek Vykydal from comment #9)
> Still no reply to comment #8 from Ryan, adding needinfo on Sandro.

Rya answered in comment #10
Comment 15 RHEL Program Management 2021-01-08 07:25:00 UTC 
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.
Comment 16 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 00:04:58 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.