Bug 151156 - ipcs -t output incorrectly labels semaphore section as "shared memory"
ipcs -t output incorrectly labels semaphore section as "shared memory"
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: util-linux (Show other bugs)
4.0
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Karel Zak
Ben Levenson
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 156320 156322
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-03-15 09:34 EST by Steve Bonneville
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:07 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2005-669
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-05 12:51:28 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Steve Bonneville 2005-03-15 09:34:11 EST
The ipcs -t command has a typo in its output; the second section is marked
"Shared Memory Operation/Change Times" when it should probably be marked
something like "Semaphores Operation/Change Times".

Affected packages include:
  util-linux-2.12a-16.EL.4.6  (RHEL 4)
  util-linux-2.11y-31.2       (RHEL 3)
Comment 1 Karel Zak 2005-03-30 06:00:23 EST
Fixed in FC4.
Comment 2 Karel Zak 2005-04-04 09:02:03 EDT
Fixed in FC3.
Comment 10 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-09-28 11:53:25 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-626.html
Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-05 12:51:28 EDT
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-669.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.