Bug 151348 (IT_68821) - The vte python module fails to import
Summary: The vte python module fails to import
Alias: IT_68821
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: vte   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Warren Togami
QA Contact:
Depends On:
Blocks: 156322
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2005-03-17 07:51 UTC by Manish Singh
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:07 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2005-590
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-10-05 15:38:51 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch lets the module load successfully (636 bytes, patch)
2005-03-17 07:51 UTC, Manish Singh
no flags Details | Diff

External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2005:590 qe-ready SHIPPED_LIVE vte bug fix update 2005-10-05 04:00:00 UTC
GNOME Bugzilla 150760 None None None Never

Description Manish Singh 2005-03-17 07:51:37 UTC
I fixed this upstream, I'd like this to be applied to RHEL4 too, it's needed for
ocfs2console. Silly stray characters in the module file makes it unusable.

Comment 1 Manish Singh 2005-03-17 07:51:38 UTC
Created attachment 112079 [details]
Patch lets the module load successfully

Comment 2 Van Okamura 2005-03-17 09:11:15 UTC
Issue tracker 68821

Comment 11 Warren Togami 2005-05-23 02:56:17 UTC
Oracle, in order to help us judge priority of this change, what part of your
software relies on the vte python module?

Comment 12 Manish Singh 2005-05-23 22:19:30 UTC
ocfs2console needs it, for the fsck frontend and the node configuration file
propagation bits.

I don't understand why there is so much delay to apply a simple, straightforward
patch that was accepted immediately by the upstream maintainer. Considering that
the python module doesn't work *at all* without this patch, I don't see how
there can be any worries about regressions.

Comment 23 Warren Togami 2005-07-04 02:48:25 UTC
Hi Oracle, this is the current candidate package is heading towards RHEL4U2. 
Could you please verify that it solves this issue?  Thanks.

Comment 24 Manish Singh 2005-07-05 20:33:24 UTC
Yes, the new package solves this problem.

Comment 27 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-05 15:38:51 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.