Bug 153266 - [OOo][gcj] java.awt.Frame.createBufferStrategy missing ?
[OOo][gcj] java.awt.Frame.createBufferStrategy missing ?
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gcc (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Thomas Fitzsimmons
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-04-04 05:52 EDT by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-16 18:17:13 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
GNU Compiler Collection 17463 None None None Never

  None (edit)
Description Caolan McNamara 2005-04-04 05:52:35 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050330

Description of problem:
JavaCanvas.java: In class 'JavaCanvas':
JavaCanvas.java: In method 'JavaCanvas.initialize(java.lang.Object[])':
JavaCanvas.java:180: error: Can't find method 'createBufferStrategy(I)' in type 'java.awt.Frame'
               dummyFrame.frame.createBufferStrategy(2);
                               ^
JavaCanvas.java:181: error: Can't find method 'getBufferStrategy()' in type 'java.awt.Frame'.
               bufferStrategy = dummyFrame.frame.getBufferStrategy();
                                                ^
2 errors

Where frame is a java.awt.Frame


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gcc-4.0.0-0.39

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. build something that uses java.awt.Frame.getBufferStrategy

Actual Results:  error message

Additional info:

workable around by patching canvas project
Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2005-05-04 06:01:53 EDT
Maybe should just close this as UPSTREAM in favour of gcc#17463#
Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2005-05-16 16:25:34 EDT
The patch is in gcc-4.0.0-5.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.