This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-09-28. It is expected to last about 1 hours
Bug 154250 - cannot upgrade from RHEL4 gold; blocked by gcc?
cannot upgrade from RHEL4 gold; blocked by gcc?
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: up2date (Show other bugs)
4.0
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Pradeep Kilambi
Ken Reilly
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-04-08 14:41 EDT by Zack Cerza
Modified: 2013-02-26 19:49 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-04-23 12:48:18 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
output of 'up2date -u' (11.71 KB, text/plain)
2005-04-08 14:41 EDT, Zack Cerza
no flags Details

  None (edit)
Description Zack Cerza 2005-04-08 14:41:11 EDT
Description of problem:
After installing RHEL4 Desktop, up2date -u fails.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
up2date-4.4.5-1.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. up2date -u
  
Actual results:
Test install failed because of package conflicts:
package gcc-3.4.3-9.EL4 is already installed

Expected results:
Success.

Additional info:
See attached log.
Comment 1 Zack Cerza 2005-04-08 14:41:12 EDT
Created attachment 112870 [details]
output of 'up2date -u'
Comment 2 Suzanne Hillman 2005-04-11 11:43:40 EDT
Zack, is this a multilib thing?
Comment 3 Zack Cerza 2005-04-11 17:59:13 EDT
I don't think so.

% rpm -qa | grep -i gcc | grep i386
compat-libgcc-296-2.96-132.7.2.i386

up2date is just incorrectly trying to update gcc, when the newest version is
already installed.
Comment 4 Suzanne Hillman 2005-04-12 14:10:24 EDT
No... I'm asking because in your attachment:

gcc                                     3.4.3          9.EL4             x86_64

Is the version of gcc that's already on the machine i386, or x86_64?
Comment 5 Zack Cerza 2005-04-12 14:27:20 EDT
Uh, It's x86_64. If it were i386, the rpm/grep line I pasted would have said  
so. ;P
Comment 6 Suzanne Hillman 2005-04-12 15:21:34 EDT
Oh, I see. Spacy, me. Yes. :)
Comment 7 Zack Cerza 2005-05-20 10:43:19 EDT
Ping? This is still an issue...
Comment 11 RHEL Product and Program Management 2010-04-23 12:48:18 EDT
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.